why the question mark?Surely this is illegal?
why the question mark?Surely this is illegal?
It's listed as antique of that makes a difference?Surely this is illegal?
How would listing something as an antique somehow wash away blatant and egregious photo editing for the purpose of misrepresenting products for auction?It's listed as antique of that makes a difference?
It's listed as antique of that makes a difference?
If it's not, it should be. Easy open and close case for a charge back.Surely this is illegal?
It doesn't, I misinterpreted the OP post. My bad.How would listing something as an antique somehow wash away blatant and egregious photo editing for the purpose of misrepresenting products for auction?
I apologize for the emotional distress that I've caused you.Disclose what business or personal relationship you have with Landsborough Auctions. Your feeble attempts in this thread to act as their internet defence squad are embarrassing.
Doesn't make a difference in my opinion - the way it was done appears intentionally deceptive.The images were created by AI but they were "enhanced" by AI. Usually done because of a bad picture or to remove the background and the AI messed (blurred) some aspects of the rifle together.
Its a simple question. Why wont you answer it.I apologize for the emotional distress that I've caused you.
I get that you and some others havent simply popped over to their website for a look, so for those who havent bothered and wonder what the hubbub is about...."A Chinese Type 53 carbine with both Chinese and Russian markings typically indicates that the rifle was built using Soviet-supplied parts, underwent a military/arsenal rebuild, or was assembled from surplus components."
































