LAR 15 mags are no longer directly refered to in the RCMP special bulletin

Travel240z

CGN Regular
Rating - 100%
42   0   0
Location
Alberta
I remember the LAR 15 mags were directly referenced in the RCMP special bulletin. Looks like they edited it out.

http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/cfp-pcaf/bulletins/bus-ent/20110323-72-eng.htm

I was going to print a copy for my gun case. Anyone have a copy of the original?
 
I also noticed that. Time to hit the bunker and put on the tinfoil hat!

The fact that it is no longer mentioned does not carry any weight. The law is the law despite what certain elements of the RCMP may think or chose to selectively ignore.
 
It was too convenient having the bulletin specially name the LAR mags. Gotta keep them firearm regs as grey as possible in order to leave room for bullying and and necessary charges / confiscations.

Sorry for the heavy sarcasm. So frustrating. I wish the RCMP would comment on why the changes were made. You know, be transparent.
 
I was going to print a copy for my gun case. Anyone have a copy of the original?

X2,does anybody have a copy of original bulletin that they wouldn't mind sharing?
Ya know.....for convenience sake, possibly save a fellow nutter a lot of grief,deprivation of property,and legal costs?
I've actually had the bulletin saved to my phone photos for several months now,and only just now realized that it's the sneaky revised version with no mention of LAR15. :(
 
old news, this was discussed on the forum quite a while ago

So, it is not worthy of a re-post for those that have yet to learn of this information or those whose grey matter has gotten greyer?
The Questar Int. info was what I was looking for last fall and couldnt find it when some where going on about the CX Ctorm Carbine (non-R version btw)
Anyways, Thanks for refreshing the grey matter for me at least.
Tight Groups,
FLHTCUI
 
and when the officer. Says it has been updated and no longe valid, what then?

Brian, We've been though this already.... It was never "valid". The bulletin in question is/was simply the rcmp's opinion on the matter. The law hasn't changed. Why must I keep telling you this? You've stated in previous threads on the same topic that you have retained a lawyer, If your lawyer cant figure this out you should be shopping for a new one.
 
Back
Top Bottom