Liberals plan to ''End Gun Violence''

45ACPKING said:
you mean Castro don't you?
he is clearly an out of wedlock love child from pierre and margarets Cuban romping days with their good friend Fidel.
Click to expand...

Who knows where the Bilderberg selected puppet got his genes from? His whacked out mom was a busy gal back in the disco days at Studio 54 in New York.

Hey Trudescu! Guess where numerous high & low profile horndogs were back then. Answer: Pichka ti matarina !
Adolf Trudescu.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Adolf Trudescu.jpg
    Adolf Trudescu.jpg
    26.5 KB · Views: 439
Steve_B said:
The problem with his proposed review based on functionality is precedent, i.e., now that you've agreed that a bunch of semi-automatic rifles are justifiably prohibited as assault weapons, how could any rifle with similar functionality not be prohibited?
Click to expand...

It's a stretch for sure... but if it defines semi-automatic as it should be, and that is NOT select-fire or fully-automatic and thus not an assault rifle or assault weapon, that would provide backing for countering the hype with a properly-determined and accepted definition.

Again, it's a stretch since a lot of people don't want that kind of review and conversation to happen.
 
Lol the Liberals and media are still talking about how he’s going to legalize assault weapons. I’m still voting for him but O’Toole really threw us under the bus for nothing.
 
billbikes61 said:
Very accurate statement. I agree 100%. The best part is O'toole is probably in the 10%. I'm sure even Blair is still holding an RPAL if not a conceal/carry permit. I really find it humourous that people are pelting Trudeau with rocks. To get elected the first time he made it so everyone could get stoned. Now they're stoning him. LMAO.
Click to expand...

Hopefully an ironic end to this pathetic political career.
 
Last edited:
TopShelf97 said:
Lol the Liberals and media are still talking about how he’s going to legalize assault weapons. I’m still voting for him but O’Toole really threw us under the bus for nothing.
Click to expand...

And with this pivot they managed to close the gap against the Conservatives.

Guns will be gone in this country within 20 years apart from a few select people who hold special privileges to own them for specific reasons. Bet on it.
 
The average Canadian knows nothing about firearms, doesn't want to know, and is proud of not knowing. Knowing anything about firearms would taint him/her/it. If O'Toole really wanted to help us, he could use this lack of knowledge to his advantage. A clever lawyer could write a law loosening restrictions while convincing the public that restrictions have been tightened. Assault weapons? Yes, we're going to ban assault with a weapon. We'll ban firearms that can shoot into space, firearms with an unlimited magazine capacity (we've all seen them on tv), firearms capable of firing more than 30 000 rounds per minute, firearms with a muzzle velocity greater than the speed of light. You get the picture. Unfortunately, this could only happen if he wanted to help us.
 
uglydukwling said:
The average Canadian knows nothing about firearms, doesn't want to know, and is proud of not knowing. Knowing anything about firearms would taint him/her/it. If O'Toole really wanted to help us, he could use this lack of knowledge to his advantage. A clever lawyer could write a law loosening restrictions while convincing the public that restrictions have been tightened. Assault weapons? Yes, we're going to ban assault with a weapon. We'll ban firearms that can shoot into space, firearms with an unlimited magazine capacity (we've all seen them on tv), firearms capable of firing more than 30 000 rounds per minute, firearms with a muzzle velocity greater than the speed of light. You get the picture. Unfortunately, this could only happen if he wanted to help us.
Click to expand...

LOL can you imagine that?
The Antis would have to stop pearl clutching long enough to find someone who actually knows firearms in order to point out the distinctions.
 
steamy teabag said:
There is no Liberal, Poly or CGC plan to end gun violence.

Their only plan is to end legal private firearms ownership in Canada.
Click to expand...

truer words were never spoken there.
The whole Liberal scheme is to irrevocably connect gun ownership and violence in the minds of voters.
Lucky for them the media loves this little bit of hysteria and the clicks it brings
 
"If you are not a liberal at twenty you have no heart,
if you are not a conservative at forty, you have no brain!"

Winston Churchill
 
Steve_B said:
After 2015 and 2019, we should never underestimate the stupidity of Canadian voters.
Click to expand...

Don’t forget fraud, lying, cheating and the Dominion ballot counters that can rigged to a select winner.

Remember Biden, 81 million votes, that’s more than Obama!…….:(

The turd will cheat his way to victory if necessary.
 
Right now
Is there a legal requirement to call in and verify a PAL for a non restricted face to face?
Or is that only in force in the Fall?
 
Thunderhog said:
Don’t forget fraud, lying, cheating and the Dominion ballot counters that can rigged to a select winner.

Remember Biden, 81 million votes, that’s more than Obama!…….:(

The turd will cheat his way to victory if necessary.
Click to expand...

They had literal court cases over all of this ####. There was no fix. This idea that the election wazs stolen has all ready been proven to not be true. Trump got voted out, through a horribly designed election system. But it was a fair vote, and every single avenue to challenge it and prove it was stollen went no where so stop spouting literal conspiracy theories.
 
CAD said:
Right now
Is there a legal requirement to call in and verify a PAL for a non restricted face to face?
Or is that only in force in the Fall?
Click to expand...

ATM the face to face with a pal is fine. Soon you will need to call in to verify and get a transfer number for every Non restricted. This might come into effect when parliament is reinstated.
 
Ribstaylor said:
ATM the face to face with a pal is fine. Soon you will need to call in to verify and get a transfer number for every Non restricted. This might come into effect when parliament is reinstated.
Click to expand...

Yea
Just reading the rcmp site is confusing
Says no need to contact for a transfer but says call to verify.
I think they put that call to verify in there as a suggestion to cover their butts
 
Ribstaylor said:
They had literal court cases over all of this ####. There was no fix. This idea that the election wazs stolen has all ready been proven to not be true. Trump got voted out, through a horribly designed election system. But it was a fair vote, and every single avenue to challenge it and prove it was stollen went no where so stop spouting literal conspiracy theories.
Click to expand...

Hmmmm, another Trump hater. Go figure…:)

Not a conspiracy theory. It’s fighting a corrupt Liberal, Demoncratic system.

Trudeau paid a convicted terrorist 10.5 million dollars, our tax money.

He is involved in the SNC Lavalin scandal.

He is involved in the We Charity scandal. All facts, but nothing happened because of Government corruption.

Biden did not receive 81 million votes, Obama could not pull that off. Biden cheated, period. The fact the Democrats didn’t go to jail is mind boggling. The fact that the Turd is not in jail is mind boggling.

You can think what you want, it’s still a free country for now.

Vote Liberal, than think again!…:(

Its no conspiracy, just truth that corruption would not let have consequences.

You have your opinion, I have mine. We can agree to disagree.
 
Thunderhog said:
Biden did not receive 81 million votes, Obama could not pull that off. Biden cheated, period. The fact the Democrats didn’t go to jail is mind boggling. The fact that the Turd is not in jail is mind boggling.
Click to expand...

Just out of curiousity, why didn't Biden get 81 million votes? What does Obama have to do with it? Didn't Trump get more votes than Obama did in 2016 too?

Isn't the whole system based on the electoral college anyway, so the total number of votes is a moot point? Which is why even though Hilary had more votes than Trump in 2016, he still won?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom