I doubt the kimber could compare to the set trigger on the sauer. I have a sauer 202 outback in 9.3x62 with the set trigger and for a production rifle is very good. The ability to be able to change calibers in a matter of min is an added feature. Zeiss also makes makes scopes with special mounts that do not use rings for the sauer which is also an added feature.Blackcloud said:I had a go with a Sauer 202 in 300 WM (Stainless/Synthetic) and a Kimber 8400 Montana in 300 WM (Kevlar stock/Stainless). For the money, the Kimber is the nicer of the two rifles. It sells retail for almost $1000 less and shoots like a dream for an off the shelf rifle. One of my biggest surprizes was the trigger. Its THE best I've tried on a stock rifle. I have to give it to Kimber here, they really did their homework. Only complaints are that the mag is a blind mag with no floor plate and the gun is very light for a Magnum caliber. Other than that, It is as functional as the Sauer 202, a very nice rifle, and just a smooth.
For a gun I'm hauling through the bush, good enough.
Topped it off with a Leupold VXIII 3.5-10x40 and a way we go!!
Gun loves Swift A-Frames, even better.




















































