Hi Storm,
Ok I'll try to explain myself. Today I spent about 10 hours training the military experts how to shoot, and how to run realistic courses of fire that will help them with thier endevours in Afghanistan. This weekend I will likely shoot or run an IDPA match, I know where the line is, at least for me. Today was my Job and on the weekend it will be my hobby. I Don't want to charge people in my hobby to have fun which is why I am so into IDPA. I understand that some people are making a little on the side teaching firearms courses, and everyone has the right to do that. What I meant by my comment is that, I believe that when a considerable amount of money is charged for a course, the people running the course may feel compelled to give the person taking the course the qualification, maybe I am right out of it, but if I charged someone a couple hundred dollars for a course and I could not train them, I would probably give them thier money back. With IDPA we are not charging anything, not even our own expenses, so I was trying to relay to people that just because the training is free, it is not worthless, we will put the same effort and dedication into the training that we do for our service members heading into harms way. Also I was trying to relay that we will not qualify someone who does not deserve it, rather we will work with them and get them on another course when they have more experience, hence we are starting with established RO's in the beginning. As I stated, RO's from other disiplines, as I think I mentioned. So if I had no respect for other disiplines, I certainly would not have made that comment. Hey, I love to shoot, and I love to to teach and get others involved in shooting. I hope that this clears things up a bit, remember I was only poking a bit of fun. I hope we get to shoot together sometime, because you , me, repete, tritium, popurehedoff, and a few of the others would definitely be a distraction in the background activity area.
Steve