M14 Scope mount photos

I can't answer questions about the stock in the scope mount thread guys. Call me direct at 250 721 3444 or simply email as below. Here is a photo of the CASM "MRD" scope mount that fits "between" the sight ears of your M14 rifle. The JPOINT series of red dots also offer a built in rear sight notch as a backup to the red dot. This is one cool little red dot mount.

Now, if only my anodizer would get these back to me and if I could fill my current GEN2 CASM (shown here in this photo) backorders as well, I would have a few more happy customers.

First ever photos of anodized CASM Gen 2 scope mount and CASM "MRD" red dot mount.
(Sorry about this photo, it is the anodizing approval photo I received, it is all I have right now).
http://www.m14.ca/images/M14CASM/CASM_GEN2.jpg


I love this product. The mount was delivered within days of ordering, packaging was nice, the finish on the mount was great, it came with easy to read instructions (plus there's a youtube video on how to do it), all the mounting hardware was there and the best part about it - it fit like a glove. It literally just dropped in, without having to mess with all the other crap that I had to go through for other style mounts.

http://1.bp.########.com/-rj-0rHCW1NQ/T1fq4nmpIdI/AAAAAAAAI80/k3Q6NQ0wHyw/s1600/P3035092.JPG

More pics here:

http://93zj.########.com/2012/03/more-toys-norinco-m14s.html

Thanks again Frank!
 
casm

I recently installed one of the casm mounts. I couldn't be any happier. It's solid, installs easily, and looks great. Just need a scope that will hold up just as good as this product. 200 rounds through my gun the mount is flawless but the bushnell didn't fair so well:ar15:
 
I recently installed one of the casm mounts. I couldn't be any happier. It's solid, installs easily, and looks great. Just need a scope that will hold up just as good as this product. 200 rounds through my gun the mount is flawless but the bushnell didn't fair so well:ar15:
Really what happened to your scope?
200 rounds then the scope dumped out on you?
 
drewski, what kind of Bushnell did you mount on it? The Elite's are as cheap as I'd go and the old style 3200's are on sale at a lot of places for about $199.
 
what's the point of tunnel if it replaces your rear sight?
Just as a rough BUIS?

I think the best explanation can be summed up as follows:

"While the built-in non-adjustable rear BUIS included with the "CASM" mount may not be as convenient or as fine in adjustment as the M14 rear sight it replaces, for use as a true BUIS system, intended primarily for back up or emergency use, with instant access to iron sights with the optic mounted, with iron sights that are zeroed for practical use at practical distances, the BUIS works."
 
STEEL-CASM_GEN2.JPG


Review by Archangel, May 5th 2012.

Here is some info concerning the Steel CASM mount I tested recentlly side by side on the same rifle comparing it against a Larue LT608 cantilever mount.

First off congratulations, I have never fired a true 1/2 moa m14 before and it goes to show the gun is capable but the scope mount has always been the weak link.

The test weapon was a springfield armory M1A match rifle with a Kreiger 1/10 twist .299 bore 18.5 inch medium DMR stainless barrel. The stock is a SAGE EBR MOD1 stock. The ammo tested was both federal gold medal match 168 and 175 grain. The optic was a nightforce 2.5x10 nightforce NSX mounted in Badger rings.

The Larue LT608 is the standard NAVY Specwar and Airforce SOC scope mount and as expected was only capable of producing 1moa of accuracy. The steel CASM produced groups of half that.

Groups had to be fired while the weapon was cool because of POI issues with the SAGE stock. The oprod would rub against the heavier contour barrel after the barrel heated up firing longer strings and cause a 2 to 3 minute lateral POI shift. 300 hundred rounds of match ammo was fired and concluded the POI shift was chassis related and absolutely not the fault of the scope mounts. A lot of time was spent testing different preloads on the mount screws and concluded the these steel mounts only require very little preload for optimum accuracy and consistency.

After sight in the rifle was tested at 1000yards. this particular rifle took 11.6 mils to get there and the mount proved consistent in holding zero and capable of consistent hits on the 24inch steel plate. Im going to further test this mount next week after the new rifle shows and do rapid fire and 10 rounds groups and further test this mount on the new rifle out to 1000 yards.

Thanks for getting it done and also for offering to let me test out your new Blackfeather stock. Ill keep you posted on the next test.

Archangel

ARCHANGENL_GROUPINGS.JPG
 
What the hell is RW 30 Hardness?

I guess your talking about Rockwell M 30, since there is no Rockwell W scale, you must be dyslexic or something, which means that its as soft as really soft plastics, so soft in fact its below the typical cut off limit for Rockwell M scale measurements. :rolleyes:

If you want legitimacy, especially to this test which makes no mention if the firearm was fixed in a rigid vise or not, which would then make the user at fault for the discrepancy and the test invalid, you can start by properly using terms before throwing them around.

Dimitri
 
Facts, and figures should be written out properly to gain any kind of legitimacy. That post is a beacon of a lack of legitimacy. I cannot help that.

First, you cannot state the proper measurement scale of your Rockwell hardness, which makes your figure meaningless. Secondly, the test bed doesn't appear to have been fixed, making it a distinct possibility of user error over the actual scope mounts, and 3rd, your comparing a fixed scope mount that replaces parts of the M14's sighting system to stabilize itself with a quick detachable scope mount with zero support on the rear end. A comparison with a QD scope mount would have been more valid if you did it with say the Sage DCSB, cause at least its supported on the rear end.

Over reacting would be me claiming your product is inferior junk without reason, such as because of your lack of proper method in having your "reviewers" test the product. But there is many reasons to criticize that posting, and that attempt at a advertisement.

Dimitri
 
Last edited:
STEEL-CASM_GEN2.JPG


Review by Archangel, May 5th 2012.

Here is some info concerning the Steel CASM mount I tested recentlly side by side on the same rifle comparing it against a Larue LT608 cantilever mount.

First off congratulations, I have never fired a true 1/2 moa m14 before and it goes to show the gun is capable but the scope mount has always been the weak link.

The test weapon was a springfield armory M1A match rifle with a Kreiger 1/10 twist .299 bore 18.5 inch medium DMR stainless barrel. The stock is a SAGE EBR MOD1 stock. The ammo tested was both federal gold medal match 168 and 175 grain. The optic was a nightforce 2.5x10 nightforce NSX mounted in Badger rings.

The Larue LT608 is the standard NAVY Specwar and Airforce SOC scope mount and as expected was only capable of producing 1moa of accuracy. The steel CASM produced groups of half that.

Groups had to be fired while the weapon was cool because of POI issues with the SAGE stock. The oprod would rub against the heavier contour barrel after the barrel heated up firing longer strings and cause a 2 to 3 minute lateral POI shift. 300 hundred rounds of match ammo was fired and concluded the POI shift was chassis related and absolutely not the fault of the scope mounts. A lot of time was spent testing different preloads on the mount screws and concluded the these steel mounts only require very little preload for optimum accuracy and consistency.

After sight in the rifle was tested at 1000yards. this particular rifle took 11.6 mils to get there and the mount proved consistent in holding zero and capable of consistent hits on the 24inch steel plate. Im going to further test this mount next week after the new rifle shows and do rapid fire and 10 rounds groups and further test this mount on the new rifle out to 1000 yards.

Thanks for getting it done and also for offering to let me test out your new Blackfeather stock. Ill keep you posted on the next test.

Archangel

ARCHANGENL_GROUPINGS.JPG
Is there a reason why you are changing from Aluminum to Steel???
TWK
What the hell is RW 30 Hardness?

I guess your talking about Rockwell M 30, since there is no Rockwell W scale, you must be dyslexic or something, which means that its as soft as really soft plastics, so soft in fact its below the typical cut off limit for Rockwell M scale measurements. :rolleyes:

If you want legitimacy, especially to this test which makes no mention if the firearm was fixed in a rigid vise or not, which would then make the user at fault for the discrepancy and the test invalid, you can start by properly using terms before throwing them around.

Dimitri
:owned:
 
Back
Top Bottom