Quite a few countries have Nazy worshiping past, like Germany, Italia, Austria, but that does not bother those countries to exist and be ok now.
No matter how much of apologetic theories have been built around 2014 circumstances, whatever it was - it was in Ukraine, not in Russia. What is it to do with Russia, did Ukraine planned to invade Russia? Did those "nazy" say they plan on marching on Red Square?
Ukraine up until 2014 was pretty much demilitarized country, which has either destroyed its nukes or handed them to Russia under US supervision. That's why Russia so easy annexed Crimea and ignited the war conflict in Eastern Ukraine because Ukraine had no army to fight. It was after 2014 when Ukraine started militarizing after their territories were stolen. Yes, before 2014 Ukraine was looking to move its business more towards EU and US, perhaps becoming a member of EU, and US was helping with it in a good or in a bad way. But that's a business, economy wars, nobody was going to fight a real war with Russia. Nobody needs Russia itself, but their cheap gas and oil in exchange for fancy cars and phones, which Russia cannot produce.
The real motive of the Putin's war is that quality of life in Ukraine was on the rise for the past decade and at some point, it would be or already was better than in Russia. And it would become even worse for Putin if Ukraine would completely turn to EU and do well. Putin, with his gas and oil is not able to make a good life for russian people like other oil countries do. That would result people questioning Putin as a leader and perhaps some movement would start in Russia towards joining EU as well, which would undermine current Russian government. The only solution was to destroy Ukraine physically and make life there miserable. For that matter some BS legends were created to justify war, like Ukrainian nazy, NATO to invade Russia, setting traps for Russia etc. In reality Russia is needed just as a cheap and stable gas station and everyone was happy with that until Putin started this war.
In that US Mexico example, imagine if Mexico started partnership with other countries and its quality of life becomes better than US. No more cheap outsourcing, cheap immigrant labor, cheap tourist destinations. Of course US would not like it as it would be a bad look for US govt and US economy. SO, some BS reason would be created to destroy Mexico either on political level (setup pro-US govt) or war conflict where some Mexican states would be annexed in process. And keep in mind, today Mexico is not much militarized same as Ukraine was before 2014. But when US would start igniting conflict, pretty much sure Mexico will start pumping in weapons and then US say Mexico plans on war. SO in your US-Mexico example you missed one key step: US would have annexed (or "liberated") some Mexican state and then...
No matter how much of apologetic theories have been built around 2014 circumstances, whatever it was - it was in Ukraine, not in Russia. What is it to do with Russia, did Ukraine planned to invade Russia? Did those "nazy" say they plan on marching on Red Square?
Ukraine up until 2014 was pretty much demilitarized country, which has either destroyed its nukes or handed them to Russia under US supervision. That's why Russia so easy annexed Crimea and ignited the war conflict in Eastern Ukraine because Ukraine had no army to fight. It was after 2014 when Ukraine started militarizing after their territories were stolen. Yes, before 2014 Ukraine was looking to move its business more towards EU and US, perhaps becoming a member of EU, and US was helping with it in a good or in a bad way. But that's a business, economy wars, nobody was going to fight a real war with Russia. Nobody needs Russia itself, but their cheap gas and oil in exchange for fancy cars and phones, which Russia cannot produce.
The real motive of the Putin's war is that quality of life in Ukraine was on the rise for the past decade and at some point, it would be or already was better than in Russia. And it would become even worse for Putin if Ukraine would completely turn to EU and do well. Putin, with his gas and oil is not able to make a good life for russian people like other oil countries do. That would result people questioning Putin as a leader and perhaps some movement would start in Russia towards joining EU as well, which would undermine current Russian government. The only solution was to destroy Ukraine physically and make life there miserable. For that matter some BS legends were created to justify war, like Ukrainian nazy, NATO to invade Russia, setting traps for Russia etc. In reality Russia is needed just as a cheap and stable gas station and everyone was happy with that until Putin started this war.
In that US Mexico example, imagine if Mexico started partnership with other countries and its quality of life becomes better than US. No more cheap outsourcing, cheap immigrant labor, cheap tourist destinations. Of course US would not like it as it would be a bad look for US govt and US economy. SO, some BS reason would be created to destroy Mexico either on political level (setup pro-US govt) or war conflict where some Mexican states would be annexed in process. And keep in mind, today Mexico is not much militarized same as Ukraine was before 2014. But when US would start igniting conflict, pretty much sure Mexico will start pumping in weapons and then US say Mexico plans on war. SO in your US-Mexico example you missed one key step: US would have annexed (or "liberated") some Mexican state and then...