Picture of the day

Naval gun on a SP mount.

oi7zo27t2ju51.jpg

Driver not shown; excused for intense headache, loose fillings and a hearing test.
 
I’ve never noticed the steep angle of the helipad before. Any idea why they do that?

Generally speaking shipboard helicopter decks have some slope to prevent the pooling of water.

Keeping in mind that USS Stout is a Flight I Burke, able to refuel and rearm a helo but without hangar facilities, and the fact that all Burkes have angular surfaces to reduce radar signature, it may have both more slope as well as a bit of an optical illusion at work to suggest that it is steeper than it really is.

The slope on the helo deck on Flight II/IIA Burkes is not nearly as severe, at least not at the angle that it appears here.

Generally it is the aft superstructure that affects the airflow over the deck, rather than the pad itself. The dimensions of the pad (height over water, width, etc) will however affect the motion of the deck as the ship rolls.
 
Started snowing this morning....made me think of these...

77ln4vu.jpg


Canadian Armoured Snowmobile Mk. I, "Penguin".
Operation Muskox, which took place on Great Bear Lake in the Northwest Territories in 1946.
They traveled in the dead of winter from Churchill, Manitoba up through the Arctic.

DqCrWyU.jpg


Bandvagen 206 (Bv 206)
Medium Over-Snow Vehicle (MOSV)

va0Bic2.jpg

After more than 30 years in operation, however, a new MOSV is needed.
In 2009, DND introduced the Domestic and Arctic Mobility Enhancement (DAME)

GQH7GIv.jpg

This could be our next DAME Vehicle.
BvS10 Beowulf All-terrain Tracked Vehicle
 
Last edited:
You'd think Canada might be able to devise an oversnow vehicle suitable for military purposes. Long ago and far away we used the Robin Nodwell. Nodwell later became included with Foremost Industries in Calgary.

One thing's for sure, any Cdn made vehicle would also need civilian market as the military alone couldn't make it affordable.
 
You'd think Canada might be able to devise an oversnow vehicle suitable for military purposes. Long ago and far away we used the Robin Nodwell. Nodwell later became included with Foremost Industries in Calgary.

One thing's for sure, any Cdn made vehicle would also need civilian market as the military alone couldn't make it affordable.

If Cdn did make one....pretty sure it would be yellow, start with "B" and have an unlimited budget supplied by our federal gov.
 
122536338-3629692753763244-6054335044578280658-o.jpg


"Only two of the ones in photo were with the Great White Fleet - those would be the Kearsarge and Kentucky, off toward the back of the row with the wedding cake turrets. The closest battleship is Iowa. Next to her are two of the Indiana-class, then the two Kearsarges."

"All the way from S/A veterans to those from as late as 1907 - obsolete almost as soon as they were completed. In reserve or awaiting discard, early 1920s. Most were scrapped but a few found other duties. The Kearsarge, for example found service as a floating crane until 1956; the Illinois as a training ship, the Oregon as a memorial ship until she was scrapped in 1942 (except for her hull which stored ammunition."
 
Last edited:
What was the purpose for those tall towers?I don't think I've seen those on any battleships other than those of US Navy.Some have been present on battleships even in Pearl Harbour in Dec 1941.

They all seem to have a platform or an armoured box on top.Was that the purpose?
 
Spotting their shots and lookout.

BB-4 USS Iowa
05_uss_iowa_bb4_1918.jpg


Lattice mast
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search


Lattice masts, or cage masts, or basket masts, are a type of observation mast common on United States Navy major warships in the early 20th century. They are a type of hyperboloid structure, whose weight-saving design was invented by the Russian engineer Vladimir Shukhov. They were used most prominently on American dreadnought battleships and armored cruisers of the World War I era.

In the age of sail, masts were required to support the sails, and lookouts were posted on them; with the advent of engine-powered warships, masts were retained and used for observation and to spot fall of shot. The purpose of the lattice structure was to make the posts less vulnerable to shells from enemy ships, and to better absorb the shock caused by firing heavy guns, isolating the delicate fire control equipment (rangefinders, etc.) mounted on the mast tops. However, the masts were found to be easily damaged by the inclement weather experienced at sea by naval ships during typhoons and hurricanes: USS Michigan's mast was bent right down to the deck by such a storm in 1918. As the caliber and range of ships' guns increased, heavier rangefinders were required, and the powerful guns and engines created shock and vibrations; lattice masts were eventually phased out in favor of the more rigid tripod masts favoured by the Royal Navy.

USS_Michigan_BB_27_collapsed_cage_foremast.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom