Picture of the day

The gas chambers had been destroyed with dynamite.
In the end they were slow hung by an incompetent hangman.

Slow hanging wasn't as incompetent as many think. Many parts of the world considered "drop" hanging to be barbaric as well as to quick to give the villain a chance to think or fear.

I believe that slow hanging is still practiced in some parts of the Far East, Middle East and Africa. Maybe even in some Eastern European nations.

The Germans used slow hanging as a form of public punishment up to the end of WWII as well I believe.
 
German POW's in Soviet hands definitely got what they deserved. that's why all of them wanted to surrender to US or Canadian forces.
5fd11c83aaeecd150d266626655393b1.jpg
 
The garrott was a form of slow strangulation used to inflict anguish on the victim, witnessed by the executioner for viewing pleasure.

The expression "... taken to a place of execution and hanged by the neck until dead ..." is a misnomer if the sentenced is to be dropped and the neck broken. Slow hanging/lynching was far more barbaric.


Slow hanging wasn't as incompetent as many think. Many parts of the world considered "drop" hanging to be barbaric as well as to quick to give the villain a chance to think or fear.

I believe that slow hanging is still practiced in some parts of the Far East, Middle East and Africa. Maybe even in some Eastern European nations.

The Germans used slow hanging as a form of public punishment up to the end of WWII as well I believe.
 
German POW's in Soviet hands definitely got what they deserved. that's why all of them wanted to surrender to US or Canadian forces.
5fd11c83aaeecd150d266626655393b1.jpg

Gee, that's a big'un in the middle front row there.

The Germans went where they weren't welcome, committed barbaric acts, and attempted to destroy entire populations, all under the watchful eye of a malicious little corporal who had a whackadoodle idea and found himself in a position to wade in and take a shot. The regime they served was evil, and is still shorthand seventy-five years later for the worst of inhuman behaviour.

That being said, did every captured German soldier deserve to be treated as slave labour for up to ten years after the end of the war? Surely many did. Many deserved to be worked to death on starvation rations and buried in an unmarked hole in the bush. But there's a danger to painting with an overly broad brush.

My old landlord was a sweet guy, baker by trade. Came to Canada in 1957, worked his ass off, saved his money, build a little apartment building (five units) and retired to a comfortable position. Herr Strelau was a decent man. The Russians captured him (and his field kitchen) in 1944. They turned him loose in 1955 with the last batch to come home.

Did he deserve twelve years of imprisonment in conditions western nations would consider unconstitutional? He'd committed no atrocities. He ran a kitchen. One could say "through his labours he supported a criminal regime, so he's guilty by association", but does any reasonable person think he had any choice in that?

I had a shirttail cousin, lived in Bavaria through the war. 50+ years old. Sat out the war because he was too old. 1945 rolls around, "Ivan ist kommt" and representatives of the local Gauleiter drop by the house for a chat. He's presented with a choice - join the Volkssturm with the other oldies, or we'll hang you from this lightpost here as an example to the others. That's not a lot of choices. He took the armband and the rifle and went to Western Europe to oppose the Yanks. The second he could desert he did. Walked home a couple hundred miles, died shortly after he walked in the door. Exhaustion and pneumonia. A sad and entirely pointless death among millions of others.

Had he been sent east and captured, would he have deserved years of imprisonment, and likely death?

I'm in no way excusing the excesses of the German military during WW2. They should never have gone to Russia. But I don't think we can reasonably state that everyone who went deserved what they got when captured.
 
The garrott was a form of slow strangulation used to inflict anguish on the victim, witnessed by the executioner for viewing pleasure.

The expression "... taken to a place of execution and hanged by the neck until dead ..." is a misnomer if the sentenced is to be dropped and the neck broken. Slow hanging/lynching was far more barbaric.

Far more Barbaric???? That is in your opinion only. I agree that others may feel the same way but I also see the JUSTICE in slow hanging. Drop hanging is relatively new concept in history.
 
Gee, that's a big'un in the middle front row there.

The Germans went where they weren't welcome, committed barbaric acts, and attempted to destroy entire populations, all under the watchful eye of a malicious little corporal who had a whackadoodle idea and found himself in a position to wade in and take a shot. The regime they served was evil, and is still shorthand seventy-five years later for the worst of inhuman behaviour.

That being said, did every captured German soldier deserve to be treated as slave labour for up to ten years after the end of the war? Surely many did. Many deserved to be worked to death on starvation rations and buried in an unmarked hole in the bush. But there's a danger to painting with an overly broad brush.

My old landlord was a sweet guy, baker by trade. Came to Canada in 1957, worked his ass off, saved his money, build a little apartment building (five units) and retired to a comfortable position. Herr Strelau was a decent man. The Russians captured him (and his field kitchen) in 1944. They turned him loose in 1955 with the last batch to come home.

Did he deserve twelve years of imprisonment in conditions western nations would consider unconstitutional? He'd committed no atrocities. He ran a kitchen. One could say "through his labours he supported a criminal regime, so he's guilty by association", but does any reasonable person think he had any choice in that?

I had a shirttail cousin, lived in Bavaria through the war. 50+ years old. Sat out the war because he was too old. 1945 rolls around, "Ivan ist kommt" and representatives of the local Gauleiter drop by the house for a chat. He's presented with a choice - join the Volkssturm with the other oldies, or we'll hang you from this lightpost here as an example to the others. That's not a lot of choices. He took the armband and the rifle and went to Western Europe to oppose the Yanks. The second he could desert he did. Walked home a couple hundred miles, died shortly after he walked in the door. Exhaustion and pneumonia. A sad and entirely pointless death among millions of others.

Had he been sent east and captured, would he have deserved years of imprisonment, and likely death?

I'm in no way excusing the excesses of the German military during WW2. They should never have gone to Russia. But I don't think we can reasonably state that everyone who went deserved what they got when captured.

The vast majority of Wehrmacht soldiers committed no war crime. They were, by and large, not much different from the soldiers of the nations they fought. Young kids, doing what honour, tradition, and youthful exuberance have lead countless millions to do over the years - sign up with the military to go forth and prove their manhood, or some such.

Once they got to the front and the realities of what they'd gotten themselves into, mostly they were fighting to stay alive another few minutes, and keep their friends alive.

Were there fervent "National Socialists" within their ranks? Of course. And some committed unspeakable acts. The same as ardent "true believers" in any ideology or religion have done since the dawn of time, and continue to do.

The regime itself was corrupt to the core. They harnessed the energy and gullibility of the young and impressionable, and turned it towards truly evil ends.

But I have a hard time painting an entire nation with the same brush. In the end, the German people paid a heavy price for the follies and evils of their leadership.
 
Stalin did enough war crimes against his own people and even his own family that make what the Germans did pale in comparison. He beat out the Holocaust and none of his camps where ever "liberated".
And if Germany did not go in, do you seriously think Stalin would have sat back and let Hitler have all of Europe? The red army was always going to go into Germany, its just Hitler that pulled the trigger first while Stalin was finishing up cleaning out his own generals and licking his wounds after a bad campaign in Finland.
 
Well, that's why I say they wanted to surrender to US and Canadian troops as opposed to Soviets. Because all German troops that came to Russia were Invaders. Who did destroy half of the country. US or Canada, never had an Invader army come and destroy half of Quebec or Ontario or any other part of the New England in US. Therefore US or Canadian troops did not have the hatred and disdain towards Invader as Soviet soldiers or civilians had towards German POW's.
Therefore they got what they deserved for what they did.


RIAN_archive_2153_After_bombing.jpg

Got what they deserved? You paint with a mighty broad brush my friend.
 
No idea when it was done, but Belarus has not been communist since 1993.

Cool gate though. If they were shot-out sewer pipes, that's a novel way to display them.
 
Many Germans died in the hands of the allies as well.
Starvation and disease killed many, many thousands. While they were in allied captivity after the war had ended.

The moral of the story is that the common people always pay for what their fellow citizens do, and what their government does in their name.

"What good fortune for rulers that men do not think!" Adolf Hitler.



Now, where do you all think this tank was made?

5DjhodJ.jpg



Cocked and locked?

OSmNJdo.jpg
 
Last edited:
Now, where do you all think this tank was made?

5DjhodJ.jpg


Late model Valentine from CPR Angus Shops in Montreal? If correct, weren't these sent to Russia which would make this Eastern Front?!
 
Say you're on the advance, and you want to carry more shells and fuel for your tanks, but internal stowage is topped out, and external storage of explosives seems...unwise. Here's a solution - the Amazing Rotatrailer!

rotatrailera.jpg


Hooks onto the (strengthened) tow hook of any vehicle.

rotatrailerhalftrack.jpg


Rarely bounces inverted!

rotatrailerdamaged.jpg


The box carries ammo. The wheels are hollow and carry fuel!

scan0014.jpg


img_0030.jpg


rotatrailerrear.jpg


Worked as well as some of the wackier German ideas, ate up time and resources, and served no useful purpose. Understandably, there aren't a lot of survivors.

Tank_Cruiser_Mark_VI_A15%2C_Crusader_III_%26_Rotatrailer_%284535976889%29.jpg
 
Au contraire, mon ami. Witness the Beriev BE-200:

df4c61e2ef9bd3134896da1fa530e920.jpg


Amphibian water bomber. In service for 20+ years, works very well. Engine placement is key.

9f466733b6754434b739e732754a6e2b.jpg


Great looking device to my eye. The ultimate fishing cabin.

0672217.jpg


And to keep it military, a Finnish built Blackburn Ripon.

980c59a44156d45df8ae297630c8db83.jpg


One more ugly girl from the house of Blackburn. Swear to God, it's like those people went out of their way to make 'em homely.

Well I stand corrected. Pretty cool looking plane.
 
Back
Top Bottom