Picture of the day

The Honda s600(60) sports car used chains to drive the rear wheels which were mounted on a swing arm....gave good suspension articulation in minimum space and while maintaining the road/wheel angle.... I suppose if the axles are connected to an open differentials there would be no problem in turns.

the old international brand pickups had that too

the real problem is the number of fixed wheels, even with open diffs, the front 2 wheels have to drag the middle 4 wheels sideways to turn, if you look at any short wheelbase multi wheel vehicle, they use skid steer or they have multiple sets of steering axles, argos are the first type, LAV 3s are the latter
 
mcZWgan.jpg
 
Graders usually aren't getting shot at. The chain is very vulnerable.
That and a chain driven military vehicle would be called upon to go places a sports car or grader will have to traverse, open chains and oil and dust.........just setting yourself up for fail. That plus from the looks of that vehicle it only steered by the front set of wheels so unless there is something that allows it to also skid steer tight turns are not happening, at least not easily.
 
Graders usually aren't getting shot at. The chain is very vulnerable.

The major issue with chains is that they are very high maintenance items. Dust/dirt/water are not nearly the issue they used to be now that we have synthetic grease and oil but back in those days such luxuries weren't available. The biggest issue from a break down at the wrong time I see there is that the chains/sprockets are to small for the task being required of them. On the other hand if one chain/wheel is taken out the rest just keep on working. The wear rate would be atrocious on the driven gear tooth surfaces. That vehicle would need a parts truck following it into battle. Nothing really wrong with the prime moving system other than it is to light for its intended purpose. Very likely it does operate as a skid steer. Mind you, it is a prototype.

Chains/sprockets are tough. They are also positive and without slip. My grandfather used to have an old highway truck on his property dating from pre WWI. That truck had chain driven rear wheels. He used that truck like a tractor for several farm jobs. His big issue with the truck was that the wheels on it were to small and it would get stuck in deep mud and snow. He made sure he lubed the chain frequently when in use. Chain is very expensive and in the case of that truck very hard to come by. Same for the sprockets.

I have personally maintained chain that was being used under very extreme conditions. Silica dust, water, muck, high heat etc. It always did the job until it wore out or the sprockets in the system wore out.

Most of the motorcycles I see are chain driven. That is a pretty proven system and it delivers most of the available horsepower to the driven wheel.

Chains are also small targets but as mentioned very vulnerable if they are hit.

There are other systems that are better suited to the task.

One other thing to keep in mind, the tracks on tracked vehicles are nothing more than big chains.
 
These vehicles at the time were prototypes proof of concept nothing more. Most of the time they used what parts and pieces that were available. In the beginning this is how they did it . Mr Christy designs were passed over so he went else were ( Russia). Riveted hulls were out dated when this one was built.
 
Sweet be Jesus that's a monster of a prime mover! Don't think it would be much of a high speed roller . I wonder if they ever tried rubber band lags. Twin winches frount and a third on the rear deck the only thing missing would be a gantry/ crane. What would be the MPG on such a beast?It probably would be gallons per hour. LOL! I bet you it would be a real ankle snapper on dismount. Late 50's early 60's?
 
Sweet be Jesus that's a monster of a prime mover! Don't think it would be much of a high speed roller . I wonder if they ever tried rubber band lags. Twin winches frount and a third on the rear deck the only thing missing would be a gantry/ crane. What would be the MPG on such a beast?It probably would be gallons per hour. LOL! I bet you it would be a real ankle snapper on dismount. Late 50's early 60's?



I want one!!! Screw Pinzgauer ... a T26 is just the ticket for rolling into deer camp!


The modern version (if you consider early 80's modern) readily available in the Alberta patch. Commonly called a " Commander" it does have three winches, a 30 ton (3/4" cable) and an 80 ton ( 1 1/4 cable) on the deck with laydown gantry poles on the deck and another 30 ton at the front. The modern version comes with hi floatation tires and a price tag in the 1.5 mil range although you may gaet lucky at a Ritchie Bros. sale and pick up a used one at around a 1/2 mil.

And you are right they are a beast...pulling that 1 1/4 inch winch line around separates the men from the boys in a big hurry.
 
Back
Top Bottom