Picture of the day

A post by jim Oxley in 12 O'clock forum
Re: Small B17 bomb bay and bomb load
________________________________________
America didn't class it's bombers by weight carrying ability, but by size, armour protection and armament. Hence a four-engined bomber was classed as a Heavy Bomber. As to load carrying ability below are listed some figures that may be of interest to you.

B-17E
Empty Weight: 33,280lb
Loaded weight: 53,000lb
Max Bomb Load: 4,000lb
Range: 1100 miles with 4,000lb

B-17F
Empty Weight: 34,000lb
Loaded weight: 65,500lb
Max Bomb Load: 8,000lb
Range: 1,250 miles with 6,000lb

B-17G
Empty Weight: 38,000lb
Loaded weight: 65,500lb
Max Bomb Load: 9,600lb
Range: 1200 miles with 6,000lb

B-24D
Empty Weight: 32,605lb
Loaded weight: 71,200lb
Max Bomb Load: 12,000lb
Range: 1400 miles with 8,000lb

B-24J
Empty Weight: 38,000lb
Loaded weight: 71,200lb
Max Bomb Load: 12,800lb
Range: 1540 miles with 8,000lb

B-29
Empty Weight: 71,360lb
Loaded weight: 138,,000lb
Max Bomb Load: 20,000lb
Range: 1950 miles with 20,000lb

Halifax Mk.I
Empty Weight: 33,860lb
Loaded weight: 55,000lb
Max Bomb Load: 13,000lb
Range: 980 miles with 13,000lb

Halifax Mk.III
Empty Weight: 39,000lb
Loaded weight: 65,000lb
Max Bomb Load: 13,000lb
Range: 1260 miles with 13,000lb

Lancaster B.I
Empty Weight: 41,000lb
Loaded weight: 72,000lb
Max Bomb Load: 14,000lb
Range: 1040 miles with 12,000lb

Lancaster B.III
Empty Weight: 41,500lb
Loaded weight: 72,000lb
Max Bomb Load: 14,000lb
Range: 1040 miles with 14,000lb

Lancaster B.I (Special)
Empty Weight: 36,000lb
Loaded weight: 72,000lb
Max Bomb Load: 20,000lb - Grand Slam
Range: 660 miles with 20,000lb

Heinkel He 111H
Empty Weight: 17,000lb
Loaded weight: 30,850lb
Max Bomb Load: 7,165lb
Range: 910 miles with 6,000lb

Heinkel He 177A-5
Empty Weight: 37,038lb
Loaded weight: 68,343lb
Max Bomb Load: 13,225lb
Range: 1200 miles with 11,000lb

As can be seen from the above the load carrying of the B-17 (any model) is really quite poor. But the built-in survivability, which accounts for much of it's loaded weight, was legendary.

The B-24 could carry more, and over a greater distance. One reason why it was the popular choice with Pacific air force generals. But it was a more difficult aircraft to fly than the B-17, especially in formation and did not have quite the same strength to combat damage.

The Halifax could carry a (slightly) larger load than the standard Lancaster, and over a greater distance. But it too was more difficult to fly than it's counterpart, and was more susceptible to damage.

Of all the bombers shown above, only the Lancaster could carry more than it's rated max bomb load. That was the Grand Slam. But that was only in the specially modified B.I's, which were stripped of much equipment to assist in lift. And to it's extremely long bomb bay.

Interestingly the German bombers also had very good lift capabilities, especially the He 111. But at the expense of protective armour and armament. But pound for pound the german bombers could out bomb any equivalent Allied bomber.

Now the B-29.....well that's in a class all by itself. A truly outstanding aircraft. If it had flown over Germany the Luftwaffe, in all probability, would have been as ineffective against it as the Japanese.

Compare these with a Mosquito with 2000lb standard bomb load and up to 4000lb single bomb load with two engines and crew of two and effectiveness of more accurate delivery. regardless of the pickle barrel at 25,000 feet claims with the Norden bomb sight
 
I really don't want to be "that guy", lads, but just so you know, here's the very first post in this thread, made dang near five years ago:

Hey guys! Was wondering if I put up a military picture a day (WW2 for the most part) we could discuss what we see, and think what the picture means. I am just a young pup to most, but am really interested in anything military. I know a lot of you guys know a lot more then me! and I am all about learning new things.

Cheers
Joe

Now while I find shocking pix like the Japanese gentleman being murdered live on TV as riveting as anyone else, I'd respectfully ask that we make more of an effort to observe the original intent of the thread, please.

Thanks much,

Dan
 
Compare these with a Mosquito with 2000lb standard bomb load and up to 4000lb single bomb load with two engines and crew of two and effectiveness of more accurate delivery. regardless of the pickle barrel at 25,000 feet claims with the Norden bomb sight

Thanks. As soon as I saw that list and the poor bomb load of the B17 I thought of the Mosquito.
 
Did the nuclear holocaust melt your permafrost, but you still need to navigate your Super Heavy class tanks to fend off evil capitalist aggressors?

The Object 279 might just be the Super Heavy you're looking for:

h2.jpg


279_kubinka1.jpg


object-279.jpg


Weight 60 metric tons
Length 6,770 mm (267 in)
length 11,085 mm (with the gun)
Width 3,400 mm
Height 2,639 mm
Crew 4
Armor 319 mm – 217 mm (turret front and side)
(at 30° – 50° from vertical)
269 mm – 93 mm (upper hull front)
(at 45° – 75° from vertical)
258 mm – 121 mm (lower hull front)
(at 45° – 70° from vertical)
182 mm – 100 mm (hull side)
(at 45° – 65° from vertical)
Main armament 130 mm M-65 rifled gun L/60 (24 rounds)
Secondary armament 14.5 × 114 mm KPVT coaxial machine gun (800 rounds)
Engine 2DG-8M diesel engine 1000 hp
Operational range 300 km
Speed 55 km/h
 
Like a UFO with tracks. How did it get power to the drive wheels?

Ah - did some research and found out:

Interesting design to solve a specific problem.

A 60 ton tank with 8 psi distributed ground pressure. It was literally designed to cope with the potential of thawed muskeg after a nuclear blast. Could grind its way through muck deep enough for it to sink past its lower glacis.


They made 3 and did some fairly extensive testing on it. It performed reasonably well, but had some critical flaws. "Turning" was not among its major capabilities. Very expensive to make, and complicated to maintain - which goes counter to Soviet design philosophy.

Also, while the commander, gunner, and loader had plenty of room in the Turret basket, the driver - who was located in the forward part of the hull - could not be more than 5'6". This last bit wasn't a deal breaker. Soviet tanks are notorious for wedging crew members into tight spaces.
 
http://1.bp.########.com/-HfOFCSyiZy8/TfbhN4ZvzWI/AAAAAAAAAOI/1JVm6j7NmuM/s1600/B17+Liberty+Belle+Crash.jpg

^ B-17 Liberty Belle in a less happy time.

A fuel leak aboard the World War II-era B-17 bomber "Liberty Belle" caused the in-flight fire that destroyed the historic airplane when it made an emergency landing in an Illinois corn field in June 2011, the NTSB said in its final accident report.

According to investigators, the weekend before the crash mechanics identified a fuel leak, which was subsequently repaired. A final inspection on the morning of the accident flight did not reveal any evidence of a leak and the airplane was cleared for flight.

Shortly after takeoff, the flight crew noticed a faint odor of gasoline in the cockpit and a small amount of smoke near the radio room. They immediately initiated a turn back to the departure airport. At the same time, they received a radio call from the pilot of a T-6 Texan chase plane advising there was a fire visible on the left wing. The pilot of the B-17G decided to execute an emergency landing.

Due to mud, fire engines could not reach the airplane, allowing the fire to spread and destroy it. There were seven people on board the airplane when the fire broke out. One sustained minor injuries and the rest were unhurt.

During the post-accident examination, investigators discovered a crack in a fuel tank that was never repaired. The NTSB determined the probable cause of the accident to be the inadequate repair that allowed the fuel leak to continue, ultimately resulting in the in-flight fire.
 
Currently undergoing rebuild at Brooks Aviation in Georgia, perhaps to flyable standard. Hard to say how much of the original plane was left usable:

Liberty-Belle-fire.jpg


Like making sushi with fish heads and fins. if they get that sad wreckage flying again, it'll be a tribute to what you can do when you throw enough money at something. :)

Hell, this looks more rebuildable:

archive-us-navy-photos-showing-the-attack-on-pearl-harbor-b-17-fortress-hickam-field-hawaii-7th-dec-1941-02-2.jpg
 


This Austro-Hungarian observer has plenty of firepower to defend his reconnaissance aircraft.

Pictured:
Austro-Hungarian aircraft gunner with an arranged anti-aircraft gun made out from Mausers C-96, 1917

Ten Mauser C96 pistols are hooked up to fire in unison. At close range, the observer could rapidly fire volleys of bullets, almost like an airborne shotgun. Reloading this mechanism in flight, however, must have been excruciatingly difficult.

The Austro-Hungarian aircraft gunner in the picture is seen using a Mauser C96 pistol combination, probably just for demonstration. Each pistol held a clip of ten bullets and the device attached to them fired them in unison, giving the gunner the ability to rapidly fire 100 rounds in volleys of 10. Two bars passed through the five upper and five lower trigger guards and were attached to the single aiming grip that can be seen in his hand. It had a trigger at the end which was pulled to fire all ten pistoles at the same time. Given the close arrangement of the pistols, if the gunfire did hit the enemy aircraft, it would have been like using a shotgun. With the light frame and canvas structures of early war aircraft that might have been enough to bring it done. But one has to wonder how long it would take, and how difficult it would be, to reload and re-mount all ten pistols while maneuvering and trying to avoid nearby enemy aircraft.

The C96 was introduced in 1896 and was immediately popular, being sold to governments, commercially to civilians and individual military officers within the first year of production. As a military sidearm, the pistols saw service in various colonial wars, as well as World War I, The Easter Rising, the Estonian War of Independence, the Spanish Civil War, the Chinese Civil War and World War II. The C96 also became a staple of Bolshevik Commissars and various warlords and gang leaders in the Russian Civil War, known simply as “the Mauser”.

With its long barrel and high-velocity cartridge, the Mauser C96 had superior range and better penetration than most other pistols of its era. The 7.63×25mm Mauser cartridge was the highest velocity commercially manufactured pistol cartridge until the advent of the .357 Magnum cartridge in 1935. A distinctive characteristic of the C96 was its wooden shoulder stock which can double as a holster or carrying case and a grip shaped like the handle of a broom.
 
The tail was intact when she landed. Wonder where it went?

The entire remains of the B-17 where recovered and being made whole again and will become Liberty Belle (II) the B-17 had moved downstream a good ways that made the discovery a challenge. Had Liberty Belle not been destroyed by fire the owner would have had two B-17s. Sad the B-17 was not recovered and restored in Canada (we Canadians do think small) but it will be brought back to life and put into the air, just in the US.
 
Last edited:
Gotta think resto of any warbird this far down the road must involve an awful lot of new parts - the skin, most of the ribs, all the electrical, all the gauges... Damn little of the original left. I've heard it said that as long as you have the ID plate (basically the VIN for the aircraft) you can build the rest and still call it the real deal. How much of a B17 submerged for 70 years or so will remain airworthy?
 
tumblr_oh63yy94Vs1uryk28o8_1280.jpg


The Dole Air Race, also known as the Dole Derby, was a tragic air race across the Pacific Ocean from northern California to the Territory of Hawaii in August 1927. Of the 15-18 airplanes entered, eleven were certified to compete but three crashed before the race, resulting in three deaths. Eight eventually participated in the race, with two crashing on takeoff and two going missing during the race. A third, forced to return for repairs, took off again to search for the missing and was itself never seen again. In all, before, during, and after the race, ten lives were lost and six airplanes were total losses. Two of the eight planes successfully landed in Hawaii.

At noon on August 16, 1927, eight aircraft lined up at Oakland Field in front of 50,000 spectators. Two airplanes, Pabco Pacific Flyer and El Encanto, crashed on takeoff (with no casualties). Six airplanes took off, but three returned in minutes because of mechanical problems—including Miss Doran, its engine “sputtering like a Tin Lizzie.” Mechanics hurriedly replaced its spark plugs. Mildred, waiting nearby, was advised that Pedlar thought it best that she not come along for his second attempt. Still Mildred boarded. While some reporters wrote that Mildred looked ashen and in tears as she got on the airplane, a reporter/sorority sister who spoke to her while she waited wrote that Mildred said, “There’s no use making a fuss about it. You have to take things as they come.”

Of the eight aircraft that qualified, four set out for Honolulu. Art Goebel’s Woolaroc and Martin Jensen’s Aloha made it, but Golden Eagle and Miss Doran disappeared. Malloska offered $10,000 for Miss Doran’s recovery. The U.S. Navy searched for 12 days and found nothing. Ten aviators died—three preparing for the race, five during it, and two in the search for survivors.



Read more: http://www.airspacemag.com/history-...nd-aunt-mildred-79371463/#oDBKA4iTtvizXz0z.99
Save 47% when you subscribe to Air & Space magazine http://bit.ly/NaSX4X
Follow us: @AirSpaceMag on Twitter
 
Last edited:
She looks a bit like an early Drew Barrymore. The first non-stop trans-Pacific crossing was by Clyde Pangborn in 1931. He crash-landed his aircraft, named Miss Veedol, in Wenachee, WA. The Wenachee airport is named after Pangborn and they have a flying replica of Miss Veedol.
 
Back
Top Bottom