Picture of the day

AN-2 is truck of sky - anytime, anywhere, at speeds below what you thought was possible.

0552299-v40-10.jpg


Antonov and various licensees made a ton of them, and by all reports, they're reliable as a stone axe and half as complex.

The turbine AN-3 changes the look considerably, but not to the worse, to my eye anyhow:

Antonov_An-3T_RA-05888_(9506536536).jpg
 
IFR procedure for AN2 engine failure is very simple. Just pull the stick full aft and wait. It has no stall speed. It just mushes at around 43 knots to touchdown. If you don't hit hydro lines or the side of a building along the way, you'll probably walk away.
 
Military aircraft operating as crop dusters? How about a crop duster operating as a military aircraft?

Here's the Air Tractor AT-802 at home, doing what it likes to do - killin' bugs, spraying mystery goo on crops, etc:

1820418.jpg


But on Saturday nights, it likes to drink, and it's a mean drunk. This is the AT-802U surveillance and ground attack aircraft:

ag-802u.jpg


802U_1_0.jpg


1073301_original.jpg


More details here, in case you want to buy one:
 
No,but it's likely 1/2 price of a Tucano,not to mention maintenance of it is laughable when compared.

Edit-someone did compared them: https://rhk111smilitaryandarmspage.wordpress.com/2014/02/14/the-at-802u-air-tractor-versus-the-a-29b-super-tucano/
 
No,but it's likely 1/2 price of a Tucano,not to mention maintenance of it is laughable when compared.

Edit-someone did compared them: https://rhk111smilitaryandarmspage....2u-air-tractor-versus-the-a-29b-super-tucano/

Some questionable logic in that article...

Yes the Tucano is a smaller/faster target, but would that actually equate to higher survivability against modern weapons? Below a certain speed, pretty much any aircraft is effectively a static target for guided anti-air missiles, even of the shoulder fired flavour. And neither of these aircraft is likely to survive a hit from a missile.

Or am I totally mistaken here?

I would almost be willing to sacrifice the speed of the Tucano, for the small arms survivability of the Tractor - not to mention that with double the loiter time, the ground pounders would probably prefer the Tractor above them.
 
I would argue that in any counter insurgency operation in today's world that the likely availability of MANPADS would necessitate some means of self-defence/Chaff/IR Flare/Distraction system.
 
"Slow and old" is an ancient and time-honoured recipe from the ground attack kitchen:

Hs_123_1939_Poland.jpg


20160712012233_2.jpg


http://4.bp.########.com/-WNiXBHjrbs4/VVIg2GvLVgI/AAAAAAAASFA/xh6PnbGikso/s1600/hs%2B123.jpg

The Germans retired the HS 123 when they ran out of spares.
 
Looks similar to a helldiver or even the hughes H-1 racer same fuselage shape. The fiat CR 32 imo one of the nicest biplanes, a little dated for ww2. Saw action during the Spanish civil war.
fiat_cr-32-10.jpg
 
My Son visited two of the most dispirited places on the planet this week along with pictures he sent he was astounded by the sheer scale of the camps.

He is very interested in history and during down time has taken every advantage to learn while living in Europe.

7aa63a346c4187bc0fd4cee52194911b_zpslfz9v2j9.jpg
081cb0283157000223c2d8c9f4ae77fe_zps86htbs4y.jpg
a1d1f6b728fc54f55c7ac882bf5d9465_zps08kklyxz.jpg
58e73b1afd204b2c24790474458f9fac_zpsdv0gkabg.jpg
10256d5d6d4970b99a4c2ab5f9e2cc5e_zpse03na2hs.jpg
e46f6a1cf849d9165892d04d2fb9707c_zps4xd7ynyp.jpg
19e109fbf39f2ef120cedbd54c85302c_zpsohfew9aa.jpg

ce6aa92107c779192c05652528ac97a9_zpsksagfw3g.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom