Here's a conversation starter...
![]()
Back when we were a confident nation with aspirations of becoming a true world power. Adopted under a Conservative government, scrapped under a Liberal government - go figure.
Here's a conversation starter...
![]()
Coming up to the 60th anniversary of the official roll-out.
![]()
i think the f-104 is distinct in that it doesnt really take off, it just travels in a straight line while the earth curves away from under it
Back when we were a confident nation with aspirations of becoming a true world power. Adopted under a Conservative government, scrapped under a Liberal government - go figure.
Back when we were a confident nation with aspirations of becoming a true world power. Adopted under a Conservative government, scrapped under a Liberal government - go figure.
Here's a conversation starter...
![]()
It is important to remember not all Germans were Nazi's. This was especially the case in the Kreigsmarine.
What do you mean they didn't survive into jet age?Sure they did.Beside american boats mentioned already Russia and China had,have and will have flying boats in service.
Indonesia,Philippines and Australia had flying boats in service into late 1970's,early 80s.Japanese love affair with flying boats is well known and continues with ShinMaywa US-2.So is Chinese with new Harbin SH-5
![]()
![]()
There is a new trend emerging as well-small,almost disposable,concealable boats meant for i guess special ops/insertion/surveillance purposes.Iran has Bavar-2,S.Korea and Indonesia is working on them as well.
![]()
![]()
Here's a conversation starter...
![]()
Adopted under a Conservative government, scrapped under a Liberal government - go figure.
Encouraged by A.V. Roe's success in developing the Avro CF-100 Canuck and recognizing the need for an aircraft to counter the threat of Soviet bombers over the demanding Canadian North, enthusiastic RCAF officers, defence scientists and defence-industry officials had persuaded the Liberal government by December 1953 to authorize two prototype airframes in anticipation of a production run of up to 600 aircraft costing $2 million apiece.
In October 1958, to cut costs, the new Conservative government terminated Canadian fire-control and missile development, and renewed efforts to sell the aircraft to the US, just when the US was promoting Bomarc missiles and the USSR's launch of an ICBM missile was raising doubts about the priority of the Soviet bomber threat.
After export efforts again failed, the project was cancelled on 20 February 1959.
I thought the project was scrapped by Diefenbaker?
I thought the project was scrapped by Diefenbaker?
Sorry, mate - 100% opposite:
Once in a while the usual tropes of Conservative = pro-military spending / Liberals = anti-military spending are reversed. Weird old world.
The Bomarc Missile Program was highly controversial in Canada.[13] The Progressive Conservative government of Prime Minister John Diefenbaker initially agreed to deploy the missiles, and shortly thereafter controversially scrapped the Avro Arrow, a supersonic manned interceptor aircraft, arguing that the missile program made the Arrow unnecessary.[13]
Initially, it was unclear whether the missiles would be equipped with nuclear warheads. By 1960 it became known that the missiles were to have a nuclear payload, and a debate ensued about whether Canada should accept nuclear weapons.[14] Ultimately, the Diefenbaker government decided that the Bomarcs should not be equipped with nuclear warheads.[15] The dispute split the Diefenbaker Cabinet, and led to the collapse of the government in 1963.[15] The Official Opposition and Liberal Party leader Lester B. Pearson originally was against nuclear missiles, but reversed his personal position and argued in favor of accepting nuclear warheads.[16] He won the 1963 election, largely on the basis of this issue, and his new Liberal government proceeded to accept nuclear-armed Bomarcs, with the first being deployed on 31 December 1963.[17] When the nuclear warheads were deployed, Pearson's wife, Maryon, resigned her honorary membership in the anti-nuclear weapons group, Voice of Women.[14][why?]
Canadian operational deployment of the Bomarc involved the formation of two specialized Surface/Air Missile squadrons. The first to begin operations was No. 446 SAM Squadron at RCAF Station North Bay, Ontario which was the command and control center for both squadrons.[17] With construction of the compound and related facilities completed in 1961, the squadron received its Bomarcs in 1961, without nuclear warheads.[17] The squadron became fully operational from 31 December 1963, when the nuclear warheads arrived, until disbanding on 31 March 1972. All the warheads were stored separately and under control of Detachment 1 of the USAF 425th Munitions Maintenance Squadron. During operational service, the Bomarcs were maintained on stand-by, on a 24-hour basis, but were never fired, although the squadron test-fired the missiles at Eglin AFB, Florida on annual winter retreats.[18]
No. 447 SAM Squadron operating out of RCAF Station La Macaza, Quebec was activated on 15 September 1962 although warheads were not delivered until late 1963. The squadron followed the same operational procedures as No. 446, its sister squadron. With the passage of time the operational capability of the 1950s-era Bomarc system no longer met modern requirements; the Department of National Defence deemed that the Bomarc missile defense was no longer a viable system, and ordered both squadrons to be stood down in 1972. The bunkers and ancillary facilities remain at both former sites.[19]