Picture of the day

purple. that may be the best written on CGN ever.

Agreed. The sheer lack of glory of the dead in war is one of the most striking aspects of the war memorial in general. I was at the National Memorial in Ottawa in November and it is one of the most beautiful pieces of public art in the country (at least). What struck me most was the irreconcilability of politics and the dead. When you enter the square, you climb a series of low steps where you alight on the grave of the unknown soldier. The fact that his bones rest under that rust-coloured sarcophagus seems to almost scream in protest at the green figures above, marching through that triumphal gate.

It is impossible to reconcile, in my mind anyway, the following: "We won" and "they're dead." One would seem to cancel the other out. Even the Greeks fought with this juxtaposition. In a society that claims to adhere to justice and peace, how is it in any way logical to kill for the same? Obviously there is no answer, other than it is a necessary evil—the curse of self-awareness.
 
"War is the continuation of state policy by other means". Von Clausewitz

"There will always be wars and rumours of wars." Jesus Christ

"And yes, it's true what they say
of war and war's alarms;
But, oh, that I was young again
and held her in my arms."

Anonymous

War is an inescapable fact of the human condition. I was quite moved by the Airborne Cemetery at Arnhem and similarly moved by a German cemetery I came across in the Arnsberger Wald (Nord-Rhein Westphalen) on their veteran's day.
The memorial book on display said that the soldiers and civilians (Volksturm) buried there died "in the final days of a war already lost." They were first buried where they fell, disinterred and reburied at that location.

Everyone paid a price. We never learn and continue to pay it.
 
I have visited a few military cemetaries. There is one near Bisley. Always struck by the young age othe dead. What gifts they could have made!

Often an entire aircrew are still togther.

The emotion I feel strongest is that war is such a waste.
 
Agreed. The sheer lack of glory of the dead in war is one of the most striking aspects of the war memorial in general. I was at the National Memorial in Ottawa in November and it is one of the most beautiful pieces of public art in the country (at least). What struck me most was the irreconcilability of politics and the dead. When you enter the square, you climb a series of low steps where you alight on the grave of the unknown soldier. The fact that his bones rest under that rust-coloured sarcophagus seems to almost scream in protest at the green figures above, marching through that triumphal gate.

It is impossible to reconcile, in my mind anyway, the following: "We won" and "they're dead." One would seem to cancel the other out. Even the Greeks fought with this juxtaposition. In a society that claims to adhere to justice and peace, how is it in any way logical to kill for the same? Obviously there is no answer, other than it is a necessary evil—the curse of self-awareness.

Actually, the original designer of the Cenotaph might have been rather distressed by your reaction to it and the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. You felt the Tomb was like a scream of protest at the figures marching through a triumphal gate above him. The Cenotaph sculpture is actually supposed to represent figures from all branches of Canadian service marching together through the Gate of Death... and the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier was, I believe, placed in that location partly because that is where ALL the figures on the Cenotaph are headed...
 
Oh, and for a picture to add to the discussion, here is a war memorial that is rather different. A large proportion of the Soviet elite forces that fought in Afghanistan came from the Ukraine. After the USSR broke up, here is one of the war memorials constructed in the Ukraine in memory of the dead from the Afghanistan war:

P1010015.JPG


According to a Russian-speaking member on another board I frequent, the words on the globe across which that disembodied hand is moving its paratrooper 'pawn' translate roughly as: "When politicians screw up - the people bleed."
 
Since we're waxing philosophical, here's a quote from one of the few men to win the Medal of Honor twice:

I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. I helped purify Nicaragua for the International Banking House of Brown Brothers in 1902–1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for the American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras right for the American fruit companies in 1903. In China in 1927 I helped see to it that Standard Oil went on its way unmolested. Looking back on it, I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.
 
Since we're waxing philosophical, here's a quote from one of the few men to win the Medal of Honor twice:


Ah yes, Smedley Butler. Had no apparent issues with all this until after he retired from the USMC - as the most highly decorated Marine to that date and at the rank of major general after losing out in his bid to become Commandant of the Corps.

He then attempted a rather unsuccessful career in politics, failing to be elected as a US Senator in 1932, but made a very good living during the 1930s as a socialist and pacifist public speaker. His success on his lecture circuit was greatly helped by his 1935 bestseller, War As A Racket.

The quote you listed above comes from an article he wrote around the same time for the socialist magazine, Common Sense.

It would have been interesting to see what would have happened to his reputation, popularity and public career had he not died of cancer in June 1940 at the age of 58 - before WW2 and the Cold War.
 
Ah yes, Smedley Butler. Had no apparent issues with all this until after he retired from the USMC - as the most highly decorated Marine to that date and at the rank of major general after losing out in his bid to become Commandant of the Corps.

He then attempted a rather unsuccessful career in politics, failing to be elected as a US Senator in 1932, but made a very good living during the 1930s as a socialist and pacifist public speaker. His success on his lecture circuit was greatly helped by his 1935 bestseller, War As A Racket.

The quote you listed above comes from an article he wrote around the same time for the socialist magazine, Common Sense.

It would have been interesting to see what would have happened to his reputation, popularity and public career had he not died of cancer in June 1940 at the age of 58 - before WW2 and the Cold War.

Yeh, I read the Wikipedia article too! ;) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smedly_butler

I don't think you'll find Butler ever described himself as a "socialist" or a "pacifist". He certainly wasn't a pacifist by nature!

You don't have to be a "socialist" or a "pacifist" to see that many wars are indeed "rackets".

Are you seriously suggesting that we pretend the wars and "incidents" that Butler participated in and refers to had something to do with "democracy", "freedom" etc?

Here's Wiki again:
President Theodore Roosevelt asserted the right of the United States to intervene to stabilize the economic affairs of small nations in the Caribbean and Central America if they were unable to pay their international debts. This interpretation, intended to forestall intervention by European powers that had lent money to those countries, has been termed the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine.

Welcome to Realpolitik. It can be a bit of a shock for idealists.:D
 
Actually, the original designer of the Cenotaph might have been rather distressed by your reaction to it and the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. You felt the Tomb was like a scream of protest at the figures marching through a triumphal gate above him. The Cenotaph sculpture is actually supposed to represent figures from all branches of Canadian service marching together through the Gate of Death... and the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier was, I believe, placed in that location partly because that is where ALL the figures on the Cenotaph are headed...

I wasn't aware of that intention. It certainly makes sense looking at it again.

But the point still remains—that duality of purpose. Democracy exists on the lives of those willing to die for it. Taken further, we can even see a democracy as cannibalistic. It eats it's own young to sustain itself. Shocking thought. But I can't bring myself to make a moral judgment on this. I simply state it as empirical fact.
 
Yeh, I read the Wikipedia article too! ;) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smedly_butler

I don't think you'll find Butler ever described himself as a "socialist" or a "pacifist". He certainly wasn't a pacifist by nature!

You don't have to be a "socialist" or a "pacifist" to see that many wars are indeed "rackets".

Are you seriously suggesting that we pretend the wars and "incidents" that Butler participated in and refers to had something to do with "democracy", "freedom" etc?

Here's Wiki again:

Welcome to Realpolitik. It can be a bit of a shock for idealists.:D

No, I just find it somewhat more interesting that he was perfectly prepared to spend 33 years of his life serving in all those wars - and not just as a footsoldier but as the commanding officer in some of the later ones - without so much as a murmur of protest. And he only developed this 'conscience' after he retired (because he had failed to become Commandant of the Corps) and when it was a popular attitude of the times (during the Isolationist and Anti-War phase of American popular opinion) and therefore also convenient both for his run at electoral office and for his popularity as a circuit public lecturer...

To be honest, he rather reminds me of some of the British hangmen, such as James Barrie and Albert Pierrepoint, who wrote books and in Barrie's case had a travelling carnival sideshow that decried the evils of capital punishment -- after they had both retired from decades-long careers of being paid per job for hanging hundreds of criminals... and needed a new source of income...
 
The scary part is that Putin is making the same opening moves Hitler made that lead to WW 2, or the Great Patriotic War (Russian: Вели́кая Оте́чественная война́ Velíkaya Otéchestvennaya voyná).
 
Yeah. The "Thousand Yard Stare", from a man that has seen and endured too much.

Gotta wonder .... did WWII vets suffer as many suicides from PTSD as do current US and Canadian vets? If not, what is the difference?


I think this painting fits with our current subject pretty well.

72781BF2-2959-4AF1-AEAB-66594ABF6052_zpsvogo5ybw.jpg
 
For sure they did. Without a question. Either by their own hands quickly or slowly by the bottle.
Yeah. The "Thousand Yard Stare", from a man that has seen and endured too much.

Gotta wonder .... did WWII vets suffer as many suicides from PTSD as do current US and Canadian vets? If not, what is the difference?
 
In keeping with the 32nd anniversary of the Argentine invasion of the Falklands:

Well, that reminded me of something....

This is an actual video shown in Argentina for Children... Except the subtitles are NOT original, but they are damn close... Prepare yourself for a hilarious 15 minutes! :dancingbanana:

[youtube]VKkcTpCur7g[/youtube]
 
War is one - just one - of the awful things we do to each other. But like a lot of awful things we do, it's one of those jobs that truly occasionally needs doing. The really awful thing is that we enter into it more often than not for invalid or unnecessary reasons. It's become something we "just do" rather than something done as a last resort.

WW1? Not necessary. Diplomacy could have fixed that.

WW2 - necessary. Diplomacy was attempted and failed.

Korea? Hard to say, but likely necessary, as the North, supported by the Chinese, would have happily consumed the south. Call it "humanitarian aid by other means".

Vietnam? Propping up a crooked wanker and his family for the sake of democracy is an old excuse, and no longer valid.

Bosnia? See Korea, above.

Gulf War 1? Bringing democracy to the people of Kuwait, who had never had it, even before Iraq dropped by? A truly silly excuse.

Gulf War 2? Don't get me feckin' started.

Afghanistan? Pointless and tragic and not a little heartbreaking. 158 Canadians died for that place. I'm not sure what we've accomplished.

Sending people into potentially lethal situations for vague or ambiguous reasons is morally wrong. Their sacrifice should count for something. We should, as a people, be able to say to the widows and parents and children left behind that "your loved one, the piece of you you can never have back, died so we could do this real, concrete thing." Anything else is a horrible lie.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

And, in the spirit of a photo thread, look at this:

43-6865.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom