This is uncalled for. "No Compromise" never meant anything like posting stupid videos to the 'net and you know it.
Happens all the time, when people dont read the whole thread, LOL
Shawn
This is uncalled for. "No Compromise" never meant anything like posting stupid videos to the 'net and you know it.
It being a positive thing depends on your point of view, if it has swayed a fence sitter into the arms of the anti hunting crowed was it positive for us?
What is positive is that these videos encourage debate and discussion. If we lose the debate, its not the fault of a video. The truth is on our side, and it doesn't stop being the truth due to someone's emotional, knee jerk reaction to an image on a computer screen. If we don't soon challenge the growing urban PETA mentality, we'll be unable to pull back from the brink. A good hunting video provides us with the opportunity to present that challenge, and explain the difference between an ethical hunt and a deplorable one, while the images on a deplorable video can be used illustrate and support our argument.
You have good intentions my friend and I am sure in a perfect world we all would agree with you. However in todays world of the "you hurt my feelings and I don't like it" mentality the anti's use every piece of negativity they can find to swell their ranks. They do not take violent videos as any kind of dialogue that is useful to a debate as much as ammunition that we are barbaric buffoons that need to be neutered at all costs.What is positive is that these videos encourage debate and discussion. If we lose the debate, its not the fault of a video. The truth is on our side, and it doesn't stop being the truth due to someone's emotional, knee jerk reaction to an image on a computer screen. If we don't soon challenge the growing urban PETA mentality, we'll be unable to pull back from the brink. A good hunting video provides us with the opportunity to present that challenge, and explain the difference between an ethical hunt and a deplorable one, while the images on a deplorable video can be used illustrate and support our argument.
When hunting, wounding an animal is very common though...
just don't post a video of it on-line.
As was suggested early on I may have not been clear with the original subject post. It appears most read between the line and got the meaning. Nothing will ever change anti's mind unless their staving to dead, at that point they'll probably kill something with a pointy stick. Fence sitter don't pay that much attention to us in general. They have no desire to view hunting shows or videos. Where it falls off the rails is when some one posts something on the net that should have never been posted. Where it turns in to a complete diaster is when some news service picks it off the net and it displayed for all to see, anti, fence sitter and hunters. You will never see a news story that shows or reports on how ethical this hunter was.
Still don't get the whole thing of displaying entire life as an open book on the Internet. Post what ever you want. Posting bad videos takes you from hero to zero in a blink and drags the rest of us down with you.
When hunting, wounding an animal is very common though...
I think that most of us are not suggesting that no hunting videos be distributed, but rather those that depict the worst aspects of hunting...and hunters.
Homosexuality as an analogy to hunting? A bit of a stretch, but I'd say that the airing of the homosexual rape of a chained underage child would be about the closest analogy to some of the "hunting" videos I've had the misfortune to see. Humanity at its worst...nothing to brag about.
That's a pretty general statement that I'm sure doesn't apply to a lot of hunters.
and stay off the internet if you are easily offended by every day life.
I'm going to strangle a lion with a Confederate flag and then eat said lion, wearings it's skin for a coat. Watch out for it on CBC.
I think you were pretty clear on what you were trying to say... but same ### marriage in the USA didn't become legal by walking on eggshells... people get offended... nothing wrong with that... let people get offended. I personally enjoy watching hunting videos... I haven't gotten my hunting license yet and I still debate in my head if it's something I'd be able to do (I've killed ducks and that's about it)... and I appreciate people that post videos of clean and the not so clean kills. It makes me personally appreciate the meat I eat a lot more... AND further take into consideration if it's something I can or can't do.
And same ### couples did not get where they are by showing anal ### on the 6:00 news.
Seems like everyone just thinks about the deers and the bears... what about the fish and the birds? Are those exceptions? Do they "feel" less than the grizzlies?




























