R18 Mk 3 vs Crypto vs BCL Badger Vs Raven Vs WK 180 Gen 3 Vs...Vs waiting for Poillevre
- Thread starter 55recce
- Start date
Lee Enfield
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Republic of Alberta
The sad truth is that due to the corrupt Senate system, the Lie-ber-als will control the senate (and thereby all ledgislation) for at least the next 10 years.
You mean the time they introduced legislation in response to the RCMP changing the classification on the swiss arms and 858's? If legislation is reactive that means it happened after an event triggered it. Unless you're suggesting they should read minds?
They introduced and passed C42 and regulations in response to that. If thats and the LGR being brought down are not enough for you then you expect a lot with nothing to offer them. That was 2 things in one term
The Sterling arms company is actually real - they were getting firearms made in Asian countries many many years ago and imported them into the UK and european market AFAIR. At one point it was marketing some sort of made in Philippine AR IIRC, it was so long ago I could be wrong, when I looked into it like almost 10 years ago. I think they also did pistols at one point, the UK gun ban probably killed most of its original business. . I have no idea why JR bought the "name", my guess is that the "company" still had the license in the UK so it is easier to acquire the name and therefore the licence, to make a short cut into the european market back when the UK was still the EU.
I was referring to them being elected in '06 and not addressing items such as ATT and Common Sense until just months before the election in 2015.
As far as your 'mind reading' comment...
Yeah, so the time they had 2 minorities in a row starting in 2006 and ending in 2011? And then when they got a majority they passed 2 pro gun bills.
That time right? They could've done the att thing prior but they added it to the anti gun ban legislation for the RCMP swiss arms thing versus not doing it at all at that point.
Lee Enfield
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Republic of Alberta
A British House of Lords policy created in 1945 has no bearing in Khan-Eh-Duh.
Especially when Lie-ber-als are concerned.
You can search for "the Statute of Westminster"
Governments replace the senate and stacks it with their own hired folks.
Also majority bypasses what the senate can do, if they had a minority, then that a different story.
Also harper had a minority government for most of his term so there is that
Last edited:
Think about for a second. In a place where our access to guns is 10x more limited then in the USA.
You already have scumbag makers on purpose supporting the bans for their agenda. Im basically generalizing to get to the point, hence the whole, look into the reddit sub to look into that matter
I don't know if sterling arms and the shooting edge are owned by the same dude, but they are related in this issue.
"It's unfortunate to see a business with 25 years of history go down like that. JR is a polarizing individual; he's got as many staunch supporters as he does adversaries. He won no friends during the Swiss Arms nonsense, but like everything, there are two sides to that story too, and it wasn't without a good deal of skullduggery on the part of some of those involved with CSC. There was no "innocent victims" in that deal; there was a fair amount of each trying to screw over the other.
They made more than a few missteps along the way, no question. We should not lose sight of the fact that JR was one of the very first to the table to mount a self-funded legal action against the Feds after C-21 came down. His suit was not claiming loss of business; he invested more than 6 figures on a fight based on a government attack on the rights of shooters. He had a lot of his own money at risk, that he lost, fighting for the rights of gun owners, which is worth some respect. There were many thousands of loudmouths who did much less tangibly than JR did.
Like him personally or not is of no importance; losing a player that big to the industry and the Calgary gun scene is going to be hard to overcome""
There are different versions of the story, and you aren't going to find a story that is 100 percent free of bias regardless on who tells the story.
The important bit is calling out when people support bans, don't do business with them, and discourage the idea on scamming Canadians
I still have the ticket stub and the aftertaste; I lost money and gained safe queens from his actions. He had a storefront here then too and if you look back you can see many people involved in those threads and the apology one are still here.
Calling out anti behaviour is always the ideal goal but one falsehood and your entire message starts to be ignored or discounted.
