Someone on Reddit said there's a law in C71 that will prevent a future OIC from reversing this current OIC, he claimed the only way to reverse this ban is through legislation.
Is this true?
"This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!"
Adolph Hitler, 1935
They still haven't addressed restricted transfers that were initiated before the prohibitions came into effect. This definitely effects private sales where the money has already changed hands and the parties were simply waiting on the slow wheels of bureaucracy to catch up. Has there been official documentation that addresses this?
He did not say that. The Weimar Republic had very strict gun control and, in a lot of ways, the Nazis actually relaxed it. Stay on topic, don't feed them low hanging fruit to pick us apart with.
I am non aboriginal / I do not speak french / I am a Euro Canadian / I am caucasian. I am screwed in this country.
He did not say that. The Weimar Republic had very strict gun control and, in a lot of ways, the Nazis actually relaxed it. Stay on topic, don't feed them low hanging fruit to pick us apart with.
I am moving in 3 weeks, they better give me an ATT. Im not turning anything in to police.
I just moved this past week with an AR15 and some handguns. I had no issue getting the ATT
I’m still so frickin pissed off.
So in 2 years I’m a criminal !
Those lunatics in Ottawa need to be ...... connect the dots !
I gotta move in middle of June ! Can I transfer my restricted still when I get authorization from the idiots ?
I just moved this past week with an AR15 and some handguns. I had no issue getting the ATT
Actually, I'll be moving into your neighbourhood. Thanks for the info!
Just wondering where everyone is seeing that they took grandfathering off the table...
http://gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2020/2020-05-01-x3/html/sor-dors96-eng.html
It’s still there under regulatory impact analysis statement, subsection “background”
I’m obviously vehemently opposed to this even with grandfathering, but just wanted to get this out there.