The actions are a copy of an older Sako design, that's why.
They retained a couple of features of the Sako but not many. Other then the flat bottom integral recoil lug receiver, pretty much everything else has been modified.
The actions are a copy of an older Sako design, that's why.
They retained a couple of features of the Sako but not many. Other then the flat bottom integral recoil lug receiver, pretty much everything else has been modified.
My only concern with considering a Steyr would be parts. Are they common here in Alberta? Do most scopes fit them?
My only concern with considering a Steyr would be parts. Are they common here in Alberta? Do most scopes fit them?
My only concern with considering a Steyr would be parts. Are they common here in Alberta? Do most scopes fit them?
If recoil might be a problem, why not buy a 243 for now and a 30-06 for later?So the recoil isn't of concern as far as that part goes for a 270.
I've shot a .308, 30-06, 30-30 and several others as I have a few friends that are avid hunters and all have their preferences in calibers as any person does.
I enjoyed the 308 the most out of them all. So the recoil isn't of concern as far as that part goes for a 270.
If recoil might be a problem, why not buy a 243 for now and a 30-06 for later?
Personally i wouldn't want a 26" barrel on my primary deer rifle either. That sort of length should be reserved for target guns or magnum cases IMO. The price is nice though...
Well since nobody has addressed the elephant in the room....
![]()
That has to be the ugliest gun ever put into production... looks like an Axis mated with a Manatee.
Seriously. Fuuugly as Fuggg. The butt looks like a thalidomide flipper baby limb.



Why not the 270? One would be hard pressed to find a better deer rifle as was the stated intended purpose by the OP.




























