Ruger American Rifle

Sure, you can buy a high end Euro rifle from $10-100K and perhaps more, but it won't be any better a rifle than a custom build or a Dakota that you can buy across the counter for a fraction as much. Pretty don't haul freight and while exquisite wood makes a pretty rifle, it doesn't necessarily make a better rifle. The newer style Euro rifles like the T-3, or the Styer Pro series with their modernistic stocks and small ejection ports are to me unattractive. That appears to be the "look" Ruger is going for with this new rifle, so I find it strange that some have objected to me referring to the Ruger as a Euro style rifle rather than an American style rifle. Clearly the look is more in keeping with a Euro rifle than an American rifle. But hey, the US government liked the 98 Mauser so much they made a copy of it as their primary military arm. By the way, actually I do appreciate some Euro rifles and I own an old straight pull Styer, a Unique "T" Dioptra, a few Brnos, and a couple of Mausers and Husqvarna bolt guns. The older Brnos, Mausers, and the L series SAKOs are all excellent rifles.

It may surprise you to know that these European rifle manufacturers have pretty much designed these "plastic fantastics" for the American market. Same goes for the budget Zeiss,1" Swarovski,etc. in optics. They are not popular over there and neither are stainless synthetic rifles.

North America has the market cornered on budget rifles with plastic stocks and shiny steels, that's why your "Euro" description is a misnomer.
 
It may surprise you to know that these European rifle manufacturers have pretty much designed these "plastic fantastics" for the American market. Same goes for the budget Zeiss,1" Swarovski,etc. in optics. They are not popular over there and neither are stainless synthetic rifles.

North America has the market cornered on budget rifles with plastic stocks and shiny steels, that's why your "Euro" description is a misnomer.

Heck guns of any type are not "popular" in Europe.

Very few people, usually only the wealthy, have the opportunity to own firearms.


I think that, (here in North America), we should take pride in knowing that the huge market that exists for "budget" rifles, is a sign that the shooting sports are assessable to all citizens, not just the rich.

Just because Ruger has made a $500 rifle doesn't prevent those with more income from ordering a beautiful Holland & Holland double rifle or such. But it may attract a new shooter who is on a limited budget.
 
Heck guns of any type are not "popular" in Europe.

Very few people, usually only the wealthy, have the opportunity to own firearms.


I think that, (here in North America), we should take pride in knowing that the huge market that exists for "budget" rifles, is a sign that the shooting sports are assessable to all citizens, not just the rich.

Just because Ruger has made a $500 rifle doesn't prevent those with more income from ordering a beautiful Holland & Holland double rifle or such. But it may attract a new shooter who is on a limited budget.

That's not really true at all. If you think of Europe as solely Holland,England,etc. then you might have a point, but the Skandinavian countries, namely Sweden and Finland, have more hunters per capita than we do in North America, and lots of guns. Germany still has quite a few hunters and guns in general, and while hunting there is expensive, you don't need to be "rich".
 
The supply of cheap war surplus sporterable rifles is long dried up. Long time ago younger shooters on a tight budget started out with these things and moved on to better guns as their situations improved. Manufacturers are providing new guns that shoot circles around old milsurp crap (Here we go) to new shooters/hunters at great prices. Bringing new shooters into the fold is important. Ruger et al are to be commended for following Savage's lead and providing for an important market segment.
 
Husqys have no detach mag, no scope mounts, no synthetic stock.
...

I don't understand "no scope mounts"...
My Husky (from Tradex) came with Weaver bases, for which you can put on any rings that are designed for Weaver bases.
(I used Millet Angle-Loc rings, but there are others manufacturers to choose from.)

The other two attributes are correct "no detach mag" and "no synthetic stock".
 
I actually quite like it. Like others have said it will make a great hunting tool. It's not pretty I do like the lines but it's not walnut. But I won't be afraid to hunt with it when the weather turns bad, I won't worry about dingy the stock when I'm getting in and out of my truck. I that they brought back the tang safety. It's a tool not a status symbol I don't need $2000 guns I'm happy with the size of my johnson :p :stirthepot2:cou:
 
I checked it out at SHOT Show last week, stock looks and feels cheap, the detachable mag looks too light, but the bolt throw was nice and I liked the tang safety. The guy I spoke to said it will be $350 US MSRP, and it will have the same barrels as found on the Hawkeye. In reality for me, I would have no problem with this rifle as a decent entry level hunting rifle, maybe even get one for a coyote hunting rig and dress it up with a nice snow camo paint job.
 
Back
Top Bottom