New Camper
CGN frequent flyer
- Location
- Lurking in the woods near SFRC.
Not really. It was by demand if you ask me. It seemed the majority didnt want the full underlug. That way it was more inline with the mountain revolvers made by smith, even Elmer Keiths gun didnt have a full underlug. It was a 4 inch bbl. Its more of the classic look, and the closest we can get in Canada due to our barrel length restrictions.
I dont think recoil is the issue lol. They make 3 inch 44 mags.
So seeing as we couldnt own any of the really cool guns, the 629 with 4.2 inch barrel is the closest we can get. At least for the majority of us that dont have prohib status.
The supply and demand aspect makes sense, what I was alluding to is all the 4.2" 686 models have full underlug while the 4.2" 629 models are not. A 44mag recoil alot with heavy loads: I am not ashamed to admit that even mine with 5" barrel and full underlug does. I have some tame target loads that are very pleasant to shoot, and the gun is very accurate but I found on a cold day at the range a couple weeks ago, the recoil from full loads hurt which isn't surprising since my hands were freezing. It is simply heavy recoil in the summer with full loads. I expect a 3" or anything lighter would be quite unpleasant and difficult to shoot. But I am getting off the subject of this thread. I'd still get the 4.2" one if I didn't already have the longer barreled sister. S&W makes beautiful revolvers.