Yeah, I agree. I bought a Nighthawk off the EE that had one installed...it broke up during a match and jammed the gun up tight. Checked with Nighthawk the next day and they don't recommend them.Don't need one breaking apart inside causing problems too
not needed
Shawn
Anyone using shok buffers in their 1911's or any other pistol? Are these thing really needed or having the correct recoil spring is all you need?
Exactly, if John Browning wanted one he would have invented one.
If we all had that opinion we'd be in the stone age still. Inventions are just starting points, not meant to be the final products.
We would still be chasing airplanes like the wright brothers, not commuting in a 777-300 at 35000 ft
Do you know who John Browning was? When it comes to shok buffers I remember Col Jeff Coopers words which are applicable here: "A perfect solution to a non existent problem". Also do you know who Jeff Cooper was![]()
If we all had that opinion we'd be in the stone age still. Inventions are just starting points, not meant to be the final products.
We would still be chasing airplanes like the wright brothers, not commuting in a 777-300 at 35000 ft
If you bothered to read, that quote was for something else, not advocating shock buffs.
But most post from the hip here I notice
I did read it. And my post stands.
Shawn
For no scientific reason I just run an 18.5 in my 45s. I don't shoot max loads and the guns cycle fine. Gives me some peace of mind
I've only had one where I could feel the slide battering, and the spring inside was both obviously too short, like it was for a commander (or cut down) and far too soft, like for a 9mm.
It not my fault you cant differentiate between someone actually inventing something to solve a problem and someone seeing an opportunity to use marketing to make money off of gullible people.
You mean like the guy that compares the evolution of manned flight from the wright brothers to 777s to shock buffers?
Shawn