I hate to say this (not really), but some of you guys may want to listen more and bork bork less. Also, the presumption that the US didn't import Russians in the same numbers etc as CA is well.... woefully ignorant.
They won't post em on the Files boris....... best to keep the status quo.
Another nice REFURB^^^
TELLTALE, GIVEAWAY INDICATIONS OF REFURBISHMENT:
1) Tula star on the stock. As 20 years of research has shown DEFINITIVELY that the Tula star was omitted entirely from stocks 1956 onward. It's a pre-1956 stock or a Canadian mod.
2) Only 2 visible stamps on the left crossbolt with a third stamp that is barely visible indicating lite sanding and refinish.
3) Nearly undetectable annealing stripe on the receiver cover indicating rebluing and refurbishment.
EDIT:
4) Just below the serial number on the stock, there are the remnants of a previous serial number indicating modification or replacement during refurb.
That's the thing though.The last two rifles aren't refurbs . they are all matching and perfect examples . Refurbs usually have all inspection stamps sanded off and non matching mags. the Russians started to put the laminated stocks on the sks rifles in 1955. but you could still get some with hardwood stocks from 1955 on .
Another nice REFURB^^^
TELLTALE, GIVEAWAY INDICATIONS OF REFURBISHMENT:
1) Tula star on the stock. As 20 years of research has shown DEFINITIVELY that the Tula star was omitted entirely from stocks 1956 onward. It's a pre-1956 stock or a Canadian mod.
2) Only 2 visible stamps on the left crossbolt with a third stamp that is barely visible indicating lite sanding and refinish.
3) Nearly undetectable annealing stripe on the receiver cover indicating rebluing and refurbishment.
EDIT:
4) Just below the serial number on the stock, there are the remnants of a previous serial number indicating modification or replacement during refurb.
That's the thing though.
Each rifle bears multiple indicators of refurbishment-- already detailed by me.
What would help prove or disprove this is:
Photos of all of the serials.
HD photo of the receiver cover.
And, well HD fotos of every square inch of the rifles.
It's highly suspect that anyone would be so abjectly opposed to performing this very simple task.
It smacks of willful ignorance.
Another nice REFURB^^^
TELLTALE, GIVEAWAY INDICATIONS OF REFURBISHMENT:
1) Tula star on the stock. As 20 years of research has shown DEFINITIVELY that the Tula star was omitted entirely from stocks 1956 onward. It's a pre-1956 stock or a Canadian mod.
2) Only 2 visible stamps on the left crossbolt with a third stamp that is barely visible indicating lite sanding and refinish.
3) Nearly undetectable annealing stripe on the receiver cover indicating rebluing and refurbishment.
EDIT:
4) Just below the serial number on the stock, there are the remnants of a previous serial number indicating modification or replacement during refurb.
I'm guessing it's inconceivable that a rework facility can receive new/old stock stocks and use them. The QC stamps around the crossbolt pertain to the stock itself, not the metal components housed within it.
This “nearly undetectable annealing stripe” is found on many non refurbished rifles.
It was applied before the serial numbers were added, ask me how I know?
Because the white halos from displaced metal revealing the bare surface are visible on the serial numbers - indicating it could NOT possibly have been reblued or heat treated after the fact. I have many of these rifles for reference.
He actually implied that annealing stripe on rifle I posted was barely visible thus it was re-blued. There's no disagreement there.