Annnnnnnd NOPE. Not at all.
Great argument.
Annnnnnnd NOPE. Not at all.
How does an engine work?Great argument.
I am not saying that KAC and LMT make low quality junk. The point I was making is that you can't assume that a product is high quality simply because it gets adopted by a certain military, especially one that has a history of procuring inferior weapons (it's not just the SA80; the Brits have a time-honored tradition of using inferior/inadequate equipment - think the Sten gun, Sherman and Matilda tanks, etc.)You are out to lunch on this particular point. It would seem that your well-warranted love for European small arms manufacturers has blinded you to the possibility that certain North American companies are similarly capable of producing world-class military firearms. The company names Lewis Machine and Tool, Knight's Armament and Colt Canada spring immediately to mind.
In the case of LMT's MWS selection as the British DMR (the L129A1), that rifle underwent exhaustive testing against the very best that the world had to offer at the time, beating out SIG, HK, Knights, and others for the win. That New Zealand would select the LMT MARS system for its new standard-issue 5.56mm service rifle similarly speaks volumes given the available alternatives on the world market and the sheer number of competing "AR" Manufacturers. It is safe to say that LMT is a "World Class" manufacturer of selected military and Law Enforcement small arms. Their production capacity may be limited, however the relatively low volume of output permits a company such as LMT to maintain a degree of quality conftrol that their larger competitors simply cannot match.
You can denigrate the continued British use of the SA80 with good cause. However I would caution you against drawing sweeping conclusions about the entire British Army and it's equipment from a single example that is more a matter of stubborn national pride than any particular love for the SA80A2. Those who must carry and depend upon that rifle with their lives are not fools and have been very vocal about the many shortcomings of the SA80. Nonetheless, its retention is a political decision - not grounds to ridicule nor doubt the qualities of those who wear the British uniform.
Why is it then being marketed to non military end users for the same inflated price? I'm sure Colt or many others can produce something just as good for less.
How does an engine work?
May I suggest
the human fund
Money for people
We has a marksman program/project at some point but the dinosaurs ####canned it as soon as Kandahar was over...
Neat looking rifle. That article needs some proof reading though. They seem to be confusing the HK416 and 417 at one point, as the 417 never fired the 5.56 cartridge as they state. After this they go on to say the 416 fires and even smaller cartridge to that. Obviously the 416 and 417 have always fired the 5.56x45 and 7.62x51 respectively and this new rifle is a direvitive of the latter.
They were refering to the csass which is 7.62x51.
The m38 dmr used by the marine corps is a revised m27 variant/hk416 which is a 5.56x45 gun.
Hope this clears up the article for you.
Those oss cans look like a pretty neat concept. No baffles.