I have an older (2005 ish?) Springfield Mil-Spec and a Sig 1911 XO. First; The Springfield Armory Mil-Specs are about as basic as it gets for features; low GI sights, trigger is okay, and it has a GI grip safety. (It's angled downwards). The Sig 1911's have a beavertail grip safety, taller contrast sights, and a long style trigger that is slightly nicer. Both have been equally reliable, build quality is a bit better on the Sig. It's personal preference, but you may find the Mil-spec a little underwhelming. I didn't find the GI grip safety very comfortable compared to a beavertail style grip safety and I didn't shoot the gun well. I ended up putting a wilson combat sear and beavertail and now I prefer it over my Sig 1911. Something to think about anyway.
Yea I was worried it may be underwhelming to have a completely basic 1911 unless I was buying some antique that had real history behind it. I’ve looked a the Dan Wesson’s. They are all nice. Just need to find a nice deal.


















































