Sterling Arms TR

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lumberjack_Kerouac said:
How is anything that they prohibited prohib?

They changed the FRT for the MS from "draws its lineage from a number of rifles and is not an AR-15" to "AR-15 variant prohibited by name" in the middle of the night without telling anyone.

They're making it up as they go along.
Click to expand...

I'd be willing to lawyer up over this one, honestly.
 
dyeman123 said:
Did round 2 come back from the anodiser? :)
Click to expand...

No :-(

They will be done on monday... so monday night is planned! :)

We still should get round 2 out by wednesday "Canada Post" pick up time.

Round 3 & 4 and 5 & 6 will be at the same time as we are running 2 production shifts to get these done asap... 75-100 per week we are hoping...

JR
 
TSE JR said:
No :-(

They will be done on monday... so monday night is planned! :)

We still should get round 2 out by wednesday "Canada Post" pick up time.

Round 3 & 4 and 5 & 6 will be at the same time as we are running 2 production shifts to get these done asap... 75-100 per week we are hoping...

JR
Click to expand...

I guess I misinterpreted what "processing" meant for the second batch, lol.

Cheers to doubling up production to get everyone their sets asap!


Hopefully we start seeing more pictures of completed TSR's soon :D
 
PinaKaleada said:
Could these still be used at range or nah?
Click to expand...

The FRT for them doesn’t exist.

By definition, they meet the requirements of a non-restricted. Especially considering they’re based of a MS, which did have an FRT depicting it as non-restricted.

That designation has been since revoked, and is now labelled prohibited.

However, the FRT is not law, and the MS (and the Sterling Arms TR by association) were not mentioned in the IOC.

It is both prohibited, and non-restricted - depending on the judgment of the person judging you that day. You decide if it’s a risk you want to take.

Many of us will be taking the risk. Many will not.
 
koesdibyo said:
The FRT for them doesn’t exist.

By definition, they meet the requirements of a non-restricted. Especially considering they’re based of a MS, which did have an FRT depicting it as non-restricted.

That designation has been since revoked, and is now labelled prohibited.

However, the FRT is not law, and the MS (and the Sterling Arms TR by association) were not mentioned in the IOC.

It is both prohibited, and non-restricted - depending on the judgment of the person judging you that day. You decide if it’s a risk you want to take.

Many of us will be taking the risk. Many will not.
Click to expand...

Too bad we don’t have a case law ruling FRT is bs.
 
apexanimal said:
It says right on the rcmp website frt is not law. I'm still shooting my TR this summer, i got the firearms insurance i recommend everyone gets it so they have the ability to fight any moronic charges without going broke.
Click to expand...

This would be similar case with the BCL coyotes too I would imagine. Can you post the link where it says FRT isn't law on the RCMP website
 
Round 2 has had a record turn around... I asked the entire team to pitch in and we went from this....

SAI round 2.jpg

to this...

round 2.jpg

So check emails for tracking #'s...

And yes, the receivers look blotchy... we normally like to give them 24 hours for the oil to absorb, and the colour to even out, but I did not want to delay these going out.

JR
 

Attachments

  • SAI round 2.jpg
    SAI round 2.jpg
    115.5 KB · Views: 754
  • round 2.jpg
    round 2.jpg
    58.4 KB · Views: 763
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom