I hate using the groove mounts on a .22 (just a personal preference) so if it were me, I'd mount bases and rings and get a decent scope for it. I don't know if your rifle is drilled/tapped or not, so it might be more than you want to spend.
a leupold on a rimfire.. unless ur hard into your competitions then pretty sure you wont need one.
use leapers.. cheap.. good range of optics.. you'll be shooting at 200m and under probably..
its a .22
i use one on my .22, .17HMR and my old M14 .. no problems ever
1) The person who wrote that article should start hitting the gym.
2) This is the common belief for walking/hunting rifles and ha merit for that application only
3) You still get old timers who believe you don't need anything more than a fixed 4x for any rifle no matter what.
There are multiple classes/roles for rimfires. A competition BR rifle and you want the most magnification you can get. 36X etc. Heavy varmint/target rifle then 6.5-20x or around that magnification level. Walking hunter rifle 2-7x, fixed 4x, 3-9x etc. In most cases lighter is better, and less magnification for a better field of view.
Anyone who makes a broad statement about only needing low magnification, doesn't understand the many specialized areas. One size really doesn't fit all.
Pick the appropriate scope for the application.
I have a VXII on my rimfire and love it. If anything I would say spend more on the rimfire scope because you look through it a lot if you're going through 100s of rounds at a time and it's easier on your eyes and way more pleasurable to shoot.
I am now convinced that a good 22 requires a good scope. I have a T/C Sporter on order which advertises itself as the 'best rimfire in the world". Well, the price is right up there!
So, right now the question is how powerful a scope do I need to bring the best of this gun out? A good quality "Rimfire Scope" focused for 50 yards or a good quality 'center fire" scope?
Let me ask this question differently; what is the effective and accurate range of a heavy barrel rimfire for;
1. Paper punching from the bench;
2. Dropping a Raccoon size varmint effectively?
Let me ask this question differently; what is the effective and accurate range of a heavy barrel rimfire for;
1. Paper punching from the bench;
Start looking for something used. Cheap optics make me cringe.
There are lots of awesome older sights for sale that will blow a modern cheapy out of the water. Try searching the EE for the following:
B&L Bolvar, 3000, 4000
Weavers made in the US
Leupolds of any vintage
Cheers,
Grant
I think they run about $500 in Canada. You get what you pay for, never more (sometimes less!). Might be able to find one used for about half.How much did that set you back?
I have a pair of Bushnell 3200 4-12s, mounted on a 10/22 and CZ452. I think they're pretty decent optics for the money, and not too heavy. With regard to shooting raccoons, I've dispatched quite a few over the years. They are pretty tough critters. If you can headshoot them, then a .22LR will definitely do the job, but these days I pretty much always reach for my 9422M. The .22Mag has it all over the .22LR in terms of terminal effect, without being as noisy as my .223. It even puts down large beavers with authority.