Hand Skills
CGN Regular
- Location
- In the 'heartland', southern SK
I agree, and you don't even need brass!

Donny, you’re out of your element.
Hemorrhaging severity which is related to lethality should be proportional to wound volume, cross-sectional area x length. Note that cross-sectional area is proportional to the square of diameter. A 45 produces more wound volume than a 22. A rather gruesome topic but in law enforcement or service applications bigger bore sidearms are favored for stopping power.
[/URL]
Big and slow plus 45 calibers were mentioned in the OP so 458 Win. Mag. and 458 Lott could be considered.
I've taken 1 Bull Moose with my 458 WM so far using the Hornady 500gr RN IL at 1900 fps muzzle speed. Range was about 80 meters and the bullet hit quartering at about 1700 fps, broke both shoulders and exited. 1 shot DRT. Never seen so much blood-spattered bush behind where the Bull was standing plus the large blood pool beneath it. That was one big ugly channel it made.
My 458 Lott will perform the same or better but have yet to try it out. It's on the roster for next season. Again the limitations of being able to consume only about 1 Moose per year.
Either are just the thing for big Bear shoulder busting.
![]()
![]()
![]()
458 Win. Mag. Remington 798 with Leupold FX-II Ultralight 2.5x20mm
![]()
458 Lott custom Sako AV with Leupold VX-3 1.5-5x20mm

^^
Excellent results with my 458 Win. Mag.![]()
Big and slow...200 yards max...
As much as I love some of the cartridges being suggested here (.375H&H, 9.3x62, .358Win are all favourites), none of them even occurred to me when I read the OP's post. He's got a .270 now; an extremely versatile and capable cartridge, a do-it-all number for sure. All those other suggestions are pretty much just like that. Sure, they're a bit bigger, and maybe a bit more range-limited than a .270, but they are options I would consider if I were looking for a (or another...) general purpose rifle.
The only thing that really jumped to my mind when I read the post was the .45-70, in a lever or single-shot action. Somebody also mentioned 9.3x74, another nice choice, but tends to be more expensive.
Suther, you sound like you want something different...so get something different. Only you can decide if another bolt-action rifle with a slightly bigger hole in the barrel fits that criterion...but I can guaran-damn-tee you that a .45-70 will definitely be different than what you now have and are accustomed to. They are hard not to love...but if you try it and decide it's not for you, well, that's what the EE is for!![]()
I have nothing to add here...just wanted to see how it feels to actually quote yourself to make a point.
For the record, it feels pretty silly...
Tough crowd! : )
R.
Big and slow plus 45 calibers were mentioned in the OP so 458 Win. Mag. and 458 Lott could be considered.
I've taken 1 Bull Moose with my 458 WM so far using the Hornady 500gr RN IL at 1900 fps muzzle speed. Range was about 80 meters and the bullet hit quartering at about 1700 fps, broke both shoulders and exited. 1 shot DRT. Never seen so much blood-spattered bush behind where the Bull was standing plus the large blood pool beneath it. That was one big ugly channel it made.
My 458 Lott will perform the same or better but have yet to try it out. It's on the roster for next season. Again the limitations of being able to consume only about 1 Moose per year.
Either are just the thing for big Bear shoulder busting.
![]()
![]()
![]()
458 Win. Mag. Remington 798 with Leupold FX-II Ultralight 2.5x20mm
![]()
458 Lott custom Sako AV with Leupold VX-3 1.5-5x20mm
Why not just load heavies in the 303?
It will certainly sling lead slow enough!
R.




























