Well, I passed my PWT 1 on the C7A2 today on the 25M range.
What unit does PWT1 on a 25M range?
You actually got an annual qual from that or....?
Well, I passed my PWT 1 on the C7A2 today on the 25M range.
im 6 4 and don't have a problem shooting the tavor at all
What unit are you in?
What unit does PWT1 on a 25M range?
You actually got an annual qual from that or....?
Useless cocking handle? It's to be operated by your support hand, not having to remove your shooting hand from the pistol grip.
Ah shiet, unit fight! What does it matter dude? He did his PWT 1 at 25m, that sounds kind of like a prone gunfighter to me. Better than just writing it off after the SAT trainer and calling it a day.
I get to try out the SA80 here in the next month or so, so I'll see how a bullpup service rifle feels for myself(although I've heard the SA80 is a piece, it will still be interesting).
And yeah...PWT1 @ 25? 25 is for snap/urban warfare/gunfighter drills...sounds questionable at best.
It was a curiosity. I'm not trying to start anything and I don't remember asking you anything anyway.... was I talking to you?
I guess it wouldn't be CGN without you being CGN about it.![]()
Oh, the internet.
We are getting off topic now though, this thread was about inducting the Tavor into Military service, not the questionability of doing a PWT 1 at 25m.
...Like I said earlier, it must come down to money and not bussing the whole crew out to the 100M range is probably saving the base lot...
I believe by "useless" he's referring to the fact that the design puts way too much stress on the tiny roll pin (especially during stoppage drills) holding it there causing it to brake frequently. Ergonomically it's great, in reality it is a major weak point. Mr. Crocker has admitted this himself in the past from what I'm told by some of the crusty old guys.
And yeah, not to beat a dead horse but the Army has already spent a gajillion dollars on 'upgrading' the C7, so like it or lump it we're stuck with it for at least another 15 years I'd say... (personally I love the C8, the C7 in it's new config. is awfully heavy though). It's not really some Gov't secret, the new rifles can be seen on Colt Canada's web site and Colt Canada is the sole manufacturer/refurb of arms for Canada and many other NATO countries (excluding a few notables).
...And yeah...PWT1 @ 25? 25 is for snap/urban warfare/gunfighter drills...sounds questionable at best.
I know what it is and isn't. The way he said it lead me to believe it's application isn't fully understood by him. Fact; it's free, exchangeable, and is adequate enough for its intended purpose.
Like I said, good review, but bull pup style weapons are not the best choice for combat rifles.
I'd like to hear some reasons why a bullpup rifle not a best choice for a combat arm. Seems to me that there are many armies that think otherwise.
Like I said earlier, it must come down to money and not bussing the whole crew out to the 100M range is probably saving the base lots.
lol Silly, but unfortunately this is almost certainly the deciding factor...and it's going to get a lot worse before it gets better by the looks of things to come...*sigh.



























