Can't argue that... but my daughter would take exception with your terminology.
I think using that terminology should result in an immediate one month ban and subsequent exponential increase per usage.
Speaking from experience?
I don't really see an issue hunting pronghorn with a .338WM
In my mind there is only one best choice, which I do not presently own, .300 Win Mag. It has the trajectory, bullet weight options, light enough rifles, easily available ammunition, power for big Brown bear and Ungulates, affordable rifles... everything really.
I think using that terminology should result in an immediate one month ban and subsequent exponential increase per usage.
And you do have an issue hunting a big bear with a 30-06? Read my signature line.
I'd happily do it with a 280 Remington as well. When you are picking an ideal cartridge I sure as heck wouldn't pick the one ideal for 10% of the game hunted either.
If you get tired of your current career, you might consider politics...
Best North American hunting round?? Where's the 303 British and the 30-30 those two calibers have kill more 4 legged animals than all of those cartridges put together
And I would ask what disadvantage does the .300 Win Mag pose to a hunter who isn't troubled by recoil face on any game he would tackle with an -06?Further, what risk does he take in using the .300 on pronghorn, instead of the -06? It's all well and good to call the .30-06 sufficient, I agree it is. But what I want to know is why choose it over the .300, which has unarguable advantages.
Doug, heck of a neat way to bag your white bear.