"Trudeau Has ‘Secret Plan’ on ‘Sweeping Gun Ban,’

Status
Not open for further replies.
CBC set up article.... read it it's a joke but dangerous...

ht tps://www.cbc.ca/news/national-gun-trafficking-straw-buying-smuggling-firearms-1.5126228

Been on and off this site all day trying to educate a few people.

Out of frustration I finally posted:

"Speaking of bans, most respectable websites would ban baiters/trolls. Notice I said respectable"

It took all of 45secs to gets the old "content disabled" to show up. The CBC is watching the show very closely.
 
could we actually fight the government in court over this? is that actually possibility? or would we have to sit there and take the dictatorship like actions?
 
The political correctness police should bring back carding if they want to get illegal guns out of the hands of criminals and save lives. Gun violence has skyrocketed in Toronto since this practice was banned. No politician has the balls to say this since it was labeled as racial profiling. From a liberal point of view I guess it’s ok to waste millions of tax payers dollars passing and enforcing new gun legislations that shake down legal gun owners and steal our guns out of our safes. But at the same time, they won’t give police the authority to do random checks of suspected gang members in the problem areas of our cities because it could offend someone. What a country we live in.

Truer words have not been spoken.

There is no engrained Rights to private property in Canada.

That may be the case legally, but legal and lawful have different definitions to lawyers.
I am of the firm belief that tax-paying, law-abiding citizens shall have the right to keep and bear arms.
The right to life and liberty is written into our "charter" , and I would argue that the right to protect the life and liberty of your family and loved ones with "such force neccecary" to maintain the freedoms that many of our ancestors fought for in the great wars, is in-fact ingrained in our Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The gunblog says that this ban will focus on AR 15's and variants.
This is perfect timing for the groper. He can virtue signal in front of the New Zealand PM while banning our rifles.
Unbelievable.

Perfect timing indeed; perhaps the groper might want to read "the accused's" manifesto.
Timing perfect indeed. Perhaps Ardern, must have missed the part where the accused [mr.Tarrant], specified that his main goal was to ban civi firarms ownership, and that he specifically said he chose to use firearms instead of other means (van, explosives, etc) he specifically said he wants to see civillian disarmament.

We shall not mention how he was "vacationing" around the world [see Turkey, Pakistan, Syria, et al] only months before his "attack" .

Answer me this: Why would a "white suppremacist" visit those muslim majority countries that he claims to hate....
 
Yes and no.

I think we would need to see a very large increase in the number of assaults rapes and murder of women in order to scare some of them into wanting self-defense. Pretty much the same principal that safety violations don't get fixed until somone dies or is seriously hurt.

That said the US is hyper violent and still many women there are against firearm ownership for self defense.

Really it has to impact someone directly.

If you remove crime hot spot cities from the US statistics, the country has an average gun crime rate. It is not hyper violent as you think!
 
No. Absolutely not. Theft is theft, thieves should be dealt with harshly. Let's pretend I have >100k invested in my hobby, does anyone think it is just to take a $100,000 from a person because of anxiety?

Also, no to banning dog breeds, sports cars, van rental, knives, distasteful art, and ideas that offend. No to banning dirty jokes, typically accurate stereotypes, the use of cash...

No to forced cultural identity, UN interference, and taxation without true representation while we are at it.



Independent thought detected in sector G......deploy resources :)
 
"Hobby" or "lifestyle" or "religion" it doesn't matter. The left will demonize us until we all roll over and drop dead. And believe you me? They want for us all to drop dead. To them? We are worse than cancer.

There are the gullible masses that prone to be influenced; It's them we need to worry about. I am not going to worry about changing Left's ideology because the effort is futile.
 
The political correctness police should bring back carding if they want to get illegal guns out of the hands of criminals and save lives. Gun violence has skyrocketed in Toronto since this practice was banned. No politician has the balls to say this since it was labeled as racial profiling. From a liberal point of view I guess it’s ok to waste millions of tax payers dollars passing and enforcing new gun legislations that shake down legal gun owners and steal our guns out of our safes. But at the same time, they won’t give police the authority to do random checks of suspected gang members in the problem areas of our cities because it could offend someone. What a country we live in.

Well said, we now live in an era where logic has been turned upside down and common sense has become a thing of the past but as long as everyone feels happy then who cares right?

For carding, police doesnt need any extra authority because carding was just another police practice. In fact, it is still going on just not on the same scale that it did. On top of that, anyone can be stopped and carded at any time.
I don't believe the stop of carding practices in cities' hot spots is responsible for increase in illegal guns. Janet, I smell that you have a hidden agenda. Why are you really here?
 
Truer words have not been spoken.



That may be the case legally, but legal and lawful have different definitions to lawyers.
I am of the firm belief that tax-paying, law-abiding citizens shall have the right to keep and bear arms.
The right to life and liberty is written into our "charter" , and I would argue that the right to protect the life and liberty of your family and loved ones with "such force neccecary" to maintain the freedoms that many of our ancestors fought for in the great wars, is in-fact ingrained in our Charter of Rights and Freedoms.



Perfect timing indeed; perhaps the groper might want to read "the accused's" manifesto.
Timing perfect indeed. Perhaps Ardern, must have missed the part where the accused [mr.Tarrant], specified that his main goal was to ban civi firarms ownership, and that he specifically said he chose to use firearms instead of other means (van, explosives, etc) he specifically said he wants to see civillian disarmament.

We shall not mention how he was "vacationing" around the world [see Turkey, Pakistan, Syria, et al] only months before his "attack" .

Answer me this: Why would a "white suppremacist" visit those muslim majority countries that he claims to hate....

1) He never said he wanted civillian disarmament. He said he wanted to see the conflict that civilian disarmament would bring about. Not the same thing!

2) He is not a white supremacist nor a terrorist. He said he didnt care for other religions/nationalities as long as they stayed home.
 
1) He never said he wanted civillian disarmament. He said he wanted to see the conflict that civilian disarmament would bring about. Not the same thing!

2) He is not a white supremacist nor a terrorist. He said he didnt care for other religions/nationalities as long as they stayed home.


reply:
1) "He wanted to see the conflict that civilian disarmament would bring about " -

Your argument's premise is that what I originally said is incorrect, yet you have shown no facts to support to the contrary.
We can play semantics, and say; "The devil never said he wanted to see the world burn" , "he only merely said he wanted to see the world up in flames!"

2) " He is not a white supremacist nor a terrorist. He said he didnt care for other religions/nationalities as long as they stayed home. "

Looks like you may wish to visit a doctor, MR.

As far as I know, the 14 words are apart of white-supremacist and anti-zionist movement. For the donkey, why would he claim to hate the people whom the countries he just visited last year, and claim now that they are enemy?
DOES that make sense to you ?

What makes more sense to me, is that he is a shill for a higher cause. Did you see the 16 minute video yourself? Did you see how there was a(n) AR15 magazine already in the mosque, before he [supposedly mag-dumps a man with a M4 semi-shotgun] , yet there is no blood spatter/spray?

Do you not find it odd how not one person screams?

Do you not find it odd how he [as shown in the "livestream" shoots a 12ga shotgun out of the windshield of his car, in the video] , BUT when arrested in the 'same' car , there is no damage in the windshield.....

Give me a break...... makes me f^^^ing sick.
 
It will take years to implement such a thing and the fibs will be out of power by then. Years later and the classic blue and cz858 are still enjoyed by many
 
Privy Council Order 1486, December 7 1941. Property was seized december 8, 1941.

If this Liberal plan ever comes to pass we will need to remind public and the media that the last time this was done was against Japanese Canadians in what was a harrowing infringement of human rights and one which resulted in an apology and reparations. It’s very ironic that Justin’s father fought so hard for a Constitution and Cbarter of Rights that his own son is pissing on.
 
Truer words have not been spoken.



That may be the case legally, but legal and lawful have different definitions to lawyers.
I am of the firm belief that tax-paying, law-abiding citizens shall have the right to keep and bear arms.
The right to life and liberty is written into our "charter" , and I would argue that the right to protect the life and liberty of your family and loved ones with "such force neccecary" to maintain the freedoms that many of our ancestors fought for in the great wars, is in-fact ingrained in our Charter of Rights and Freedoms.



Perfect timing indeed; perhaps the groper might want to read "the accused's" manifesto.
Timing perfect indeed. Perhaps Ardern, must have missed the part where the accused [mr.Tarrant], specified that his main goal was to ban civi firarms ownership, and that he specifically said he chose to use firearms instead of other means (van, explosives, etc) he specifically said he wants to see civillian disarmament.

We shall not mention how he was "vacationing" around the world [see Turkey, Pakistan, Syria, et al] only months before his "attack" .

Answer me this: Why would a "white suppremacist" visit those muslim majority countries that he claims to hate....

Life, liberty and security of person.
 
I'm happy you found it interesting. Should I increase my posting frequency to become more welcome around here?

It would definitely mitigate you looking like a throw away account, and, you may have useful insight for the community so I'd say yes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom