actually, 2 on FB by michael young and wyatt godkins. i cant remember which group cos there are two T81 groups.
type 81 canada.
actually, 2 on FB by michael young and wyatt godkins. i cant remember which group cos there are two T81 groups.
A nutsert and low profile socket head cap screw might be another good solution, less than 1$. This is the first interesting T81 to me because of the longer gas system so hopefully the stock gets a rev. 2.
For sure a threaded option would just allow for less chances of stripping it out somehow, but in reality most people are not going to be removing the stock that often I would assume?
I feel bad for T.I. but it sounds like they were well aware of the potential issue and are defending the design as developed and supposedly stress tested.
For a range blaster and wall hanger it's probably going to be fine, specially with an extra support added a la B-file.... but I can't see that design holding up well in a combat zone or other professional application.
That's a pretty good idea, a dado vertically down the stock's hidden tang and a metal block with 2 as large as practical wood screws from to back in the middle to sandwich everything once the pins go back in.One could also put a flat metal piece on top of the 2 rivet holes inside and screw it down in the middle between the holes, pre drilled of course.
One could also put a flat metal piece on top of the 2 rivet holes inside and screw it down in the middle between the holes, pre drilled of course.
That's a pretty good idea, a dado vertically down the stock's hidden tang and a metal block with 2 as large as practical wood screws from to back in the middle to sandwich everything once the pins go back in.
Not sure why poeple care about TI warranty regarding the stock... clearly they dont have a solution to the problem, but they will give you a replacement aka we will gladly replace the thing that just broke on you with another thing that will just break on you lol
TI already said that warranty is of no concern.
I am still waiting for good ideas from others, don't really see a big problem at all. Unless you drive over it with your truck which the guy in the first post seems to have done. One of the others on fb grounded off the rivets, not sure what he was thinking and if it was before or after the stock broke.
Panhead might be too thick and not allow the dustcover to close and 1/2" longer might have the screw pop out of the bottom of the stock
For sure a threaded option would just allow for less chances of stripping it out somehow, but in reality most people are not going to be removing the stock that often I would assume?
I feel bad for T.I. but it sounds like they were well aware of the potential issue and are defending the design as developed and supposedly stress tested.
For a range blaster and wall hanger it's probably going to be fine, specially with an extra support added a la B-file.... but I can't see that design holding up well in a combat zone or other professional application.
LOL.
I have an SKS, along with a Type81 SE. Still don't like the SKS. Its a crappy rifle, crappily built for an uneducated peasant army of cannon fodder. I see zero pride of ownership in something so badly built. We, as educated citizens, of a first world democracy can choose better tools. FWIW, the Type81 trigger is way better than the SKS trigger.
If you look at the original SR thread, you will see me getting #### on for saying I woudn't buy the SR because it is in the wrong caliber and the only such rifle I'd be interested in would be 762x54R. I don't own an SR.
I think TI is in for a long road fixing broken SR stocks. But that's just like, my opinion man.
Not stick up further but the thickenss of the head as to not allow the dustcober to sit properly is what I'm getting at.
If anything, adding a washer like JeffMan would do the trick
Ok im missing something here... the head has to stick out further to allow the dust cover to latch? Because a pan head would sit lower then the wood screw pictured that seems to work.
It’s hard to explain but if you look at the pictures of my modification, even a thin washer needed to be ground down at the top for the dust cover to fit. Then I still had to take a tiny bit of material off of my dust cover too.
If the screw head sits at the very back of the receiver, it needs to be thin and short. The farther from the back of the receiver the screw head is the taller/ larger it can be - this is because the dust cover sits on the lower shelf of the rear trunnion, while held forward by the rearmost lip on the very back of the trunnion.
Or just file it down.
Not sure why poeple care about TI warranty regarding the stock... clearly they dont have a solution to the problem, but they will give you a replacement aka we will gladly replace the thing that just broke on you with another thing that will just break on you lol