The anti gunners arent winning because they put up more of a fight..they are winning because they are aligned with the govt's civil disarmament agenda (Cukier even gets govt funding...our taxpayer dollar to fight against us). so we are fighting an uphill battle.
Government does things to 1) get votes 2) look good (in their perception). They know the majority of gun owners vote conservative and can you imagine them saying "after we decided to freeze the transfer of handguns and put out the narrative that this will make you safer, we decided to spend your taxpayer dollars and hire more CFO staff to get guns into people's hands faster"
Seriously, can you fathom this? Or in any other scenario like "we decided to ban abortions but first, we will invest in more abortion clinics to process the outstanding ones"...can you imagine that?
this isnt rocket science...we went from 55,000 handgun transfers in a typical year, so a run rate of 55,000/12=4583 per month to 125,000 in one month, or a 125,000/4583=27 fold increase.
if this were the private sector, what company would put extra resources to deal with a 27 fold increase into a line they were shutting down with customers they no longer want to serve?
the solution is new management...or in this case a new govt.