I like them both, and fit and finish is excellent on both. My Howa 1500 in 6.5x55 (same thing as a Vanguard?) has above average deep semi-gloss bluing, but the stock was kind of crap, so I replaced it with a B&C sporter stock (on the advice of Hitzy), and I'm now smitten with that rifle. They are probably as close to battle rifle durable as any modern bolt action. My Tikka T3 Battue in 30-06 sports a nice factory oiled walnut stock and a handy 20 inch barrel. It shoots lights out and is so smooth to operate, a tad smoother than my Howa, but not by much. They are the only modern hunting rifles that have remained in my locker and I've had many rifles of various price-points and configurations. Oh, and both are topped with Leupold 1-4x20 glass.
yes, the Howa is about a 1lb heavier. I don't notice the weight difference, but maybe when I'm 80 I'll worry about that.
Be interested on opinions between the vanguard mtn and the t3x which would be more of an apples to apples comparison
I have a Vanguard S2 223 with the 22 inch 1:9 heavy barrel. It came with the Kryptek camo stock, a bit different than the standard synthetic stock.
Accuracy was initially disappointing, but after I changed to a Boyd's thumbhole stock, any shots outside of one hole at 100 are my own fault.
I didn't really experement with the original stock as I didn't really like it anyway, but one thing to note is that in the Boyd's, the barrel is fully free floated, while in the factory stock there was firm contact on the barrel at the tip of the stock.
The Vanguard rifle has a one piece forged bolt, large integral recoil lug, proper threaded barrel (no savage barrel nut), 2 stage trigger, and no plastic on it anywhere.
The Tikka does not.
When did Tikka start using the "Savage Nut".
If you are going to lean toward a Weatherby - give Prophet River a call and look into the HOWA Barreled Actions (now come threaded) they build actions for Weatherby