If they want to keep it restricted, but let us ATT anywhere we want and discharge anywhere we can discharge non-restricted, that's fine with me. The fact that it's singled out as restricted means it can't arbitrarily be turned into a prohibitied, it has to be singled out again before that can happen. That said, non-restricted would be preferred.
um... then it would not be restricted then would it... as that is kinda what restricted means.. as in "subject to restrictions"
I don't know why people are all bent about getting the AR re-classified
we should be focusing on ALL Classifications by Type
We can live with Classifications if we had to.. but Arbitrary classifications based on appearance is not acceptable..
We have standards for the classification of firearms .. is it too much to ask that they be adhered to? TO THE LETTER .. this alone would not require any legislative changes to the firearms act .. and could be done simply with an OIC, no committee, no 3rd reading.. but by simple regulatory changes by OIC





























Airgun lover. pfft.

some people need to learn when to listen and when to STFU. 





















