Okay, I have one last question (for now)...
Like I asked in a previous post, I just want to know if this is plausible:
If someone ordered 100 Remington 7615 30rd magazines (manufactured AS 7615 mags from company X) at a cost of $1500, had one submitted to the RCMP and it was then declared a prohibited device. If that person had a pre order list of 500 units (no funds collected yet) to show the intent and interest of the market, and therefore a projected immediate profit of $XX,XX.XX, could that person sue the RCMP for their costs ($1500) and expected loss of profit based on their deliberate and wrongful classification of the magazine?
I just want to know if that is a legit cause to sue. I know the RCMP have bottomless pockets, expert witnesses, would probably win, and even if they lost would appeal until that person ran out of money.... but could you at least get them to court?
Like I asked in a previous post, I just want to know if this is plausible:
If someone ordered 100 Remington 7615 30rd magazines (manufactured AS 7615 mags from company X) at a cost of $1500, had one submitted to the RCMP and it was then declared a prohibited device. If that person had a pre order list of 500 units (no funds collected yet) to show the intent and interest of the market, and therefore a projected immediate profit of $XX,XX.XX, could that person sue the RCMP for their costs ($1500) and expected loss of profit based on their deliberate and wrongful classification of the magazine?
I just want to know if that is a legit cause to sue. I know the RCMP have bottomless pockets, expert witnesses, would probably win, and even if they lost would appeal until that person ran out of money.... but could you at least get them to court?




















































