But at least two cases in the past year have proven the exact opposite of the statement. It does not matter what you use the mag in, it matters what it was designed and built for. At least that's what I keep reading into it.contact148 said:ya but could a Judeg not just rule in a court case that the way he reads said law the mag MUST be used ONLY in rifle X and NOT IN any semiauto
Dr.Lector said:For a 30 rounder I think 50-75 bucks (depending on the quality and finnish) would be a reasonable price.
I'll buy at least two from you.
You have to promise not to paint it brown or pink or another goofy or ######y colour![]()
And not to write "Made in Saskachewan" on it either![]()
But don't let this idea rusting on the shelf like other things you said you would build![]()
promac said:I'd even pay a premium for a legal 10 round AR mag. These 5 round mags are so ------------ frustrating! Sorry about wandering off topic!

palinak said:
I have needs, man...The later, mags built for a pump rifle. And no, not the 7615. One off of my on design.angryeyebrows said:Armedsask,
So what road are you gonna take? Build a mag that won't fit in an AR magwell with out modification of the magwell or stamp the mag for use in a specific pump rifle?
Except that it does. The RCMP have already stated that the 7615 is marketed as using AR15 mags with an AR15 magwell. As such, they ruled any mag for the 7615 would be an AR15 mag.esquif said:FORGET THE GUN IT HAS NO IMPACT




























