Both were acceptably robust,reliable and accurate and there are thousands of graves that testify to this.This is like re-roasting the old chestnut about the theoretical disadvantages of the Lee-Enfield as a service rifle-rear locking bolt,light barrel,rimmed cartridge,2 pc stock,blah,blah,blah,... The fact is that most major combatants invested considerable time and effort to develop small arms which would deliver results under service conditions and most were reasonably successful. There were some glaring failures of course,the Canadian Ross MkIII being a shining example!!