its wasnt restricted or prohibited because it wasnt in the Gun Digest. lol
Designed by two different people Simonov and Kalishkanoff, two different rifles, one Semi-Auto only, the other with Full-Auto variants.
its wasnt restricted or prohibited because it wasnt in the Gun Digest. lol
Re: The Gun's Digest comment...
This is actually true. There is an article out there written by one of the people who undertook the ban after the ecole polytechnique massacre (may Lepine's name be forever followed by people spitting on the ground). This PC (Not liberal) guy was one of the guys who went through guns digest and said 'that looks scary' and banned everything.
It was the Kim Campbell PC's who did it, not the Liberals (although they suck too).
Stephen Harper is not anti-gun though. I know this because I flat out asked him. I've met him twice, he's a nice guy, and he's relatively supportive of guys like us who like to go and victimize some innocent paper.
Two ChineseType 56s. One is the AK type, the other the SKS. SKS type rifles were not prohibited by name, nor as an AK variant because they are not a variant.
I own an SKS-D and am puzzled as to "WHY" they are not restriced!
I have read on the CFC site that "Type 56" firearms are "restricted".
The SKS is supposed to be a Type 56 and is the predecessor to the AK-47, therefore why didn't the Lieberals classify it as restricted or even prohibited for that matter?
Mind you, I do not wish it to be restricted, but am curious as to the "why". The Liberals prohibited 4" barrels, .25 & .32 calibre among just some of their stupidities.
Did the lowly SKS pass under their radar?
SSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! dont tell them they might realize they didnt make it restricted
I own an SKS-D and am puzzled as to "WHY" they are not restriced!
I have read on the CFC site that "Type 56" firearms are "restricted".
The SKS is supposed to be a Type 56 and is the predecessor to the AK-47, therefore why didn't the Lieberals classify it as restricted or even prohibited for that matter?
Mind you, I do not wish it to be restricted, but am curious as to the "why". The Liberals prohibited 4" barrels, .25 & .32 calibre among just some of their stupidities.
Did the lowly SKS pass under their radar?
The SKS was based on a pre-existing semi-auto anti tank rifle scaled down of course.The PTRS which fired the powerful Soviet 14.5X114mm rd also used as a long range sniper rifle against personal and unarmoured vehicals.Harold
The AK 47 in russian The S.K.S. is chinise by design. yea i know some SKS's were made in russia, but have as much in common as the Winchester 94 and a Remington rifles, they shoot, but thats it!!! the ak & sks are completly different guns. and they both shoot the same cal. as my mini 30!!!!
WHAT THE F-CK IS THE DIFFERANCE?? DON'T GIVE THESE IDOT'S REASON TO START MORE LIBERAL/COMMIE LIKE GUNS BANS. SHUT THE HELL UP!!!![]()
SKS is a 100% soviet designed rifle. The Chinese didn't start copying them for 11 years after introduction.
And the idiots don't need a reason. They'll just keep doing what idiots do.