Wolverine on the Hill....

bigplinker said:
my-ex-just-texted-me-saying-she-and-her-new-boyfriend-got-an-appartment-together-150954.jpg
Click to expand...

OMG, this is my type of humour! LOL.
 
P90rippin said:
Not deaf ears incompetence. The questions I heard are pre-work to consideration of drafting a bill. After listening to the committee collective questions and comments it doesn't appear they can connect anything relevant to making anything safer to C71. At least they listened to the lady from the first nations who responded reasonably.

It's unbelievable the feds pass a "feel good bill" as a campaign promise for the anti-gun lobby then the committee asks questions related to social issues unrelated to legal firearm ownership and still "seem" to think C71 will do a single thing to effect gang violence or any other serious gun related crime. They're going to try put lipstick on this pig of a bill until it's passed then when nothing improves related to the gang violence and other non-related issues create more bills similar to this one.
Click to expand...

This!!!
Unfortunately.
 
Thanks for your hard work Wolverine as well as the others that presented cases, it was an interesting listen. Hopefully something got through, sadly I gear it did not. Although I agree with a previous poster there were a few intelligent questions asked.
 
Thank you "Team Wolverine". The question now is, What now Feds? Did you listen enough to hear the valid issues pointed out by Responsible Gun Owners? Or this will be another pointless discussion that will end up to what was proposed without any amendment/s?
 
Thank you from Alberta. All well spoken and accurate talking points. Just listening to the logical points makes it even more frusterating to think about what is happening in our parliamentary system.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom