I wonder who decided to teach Canadian shooters that the term "clip" is improper. It just makes us look stupid and immature - like a kid coming home from school and telling his Dad that it isn't a "tree" - it is a "vegetation."
It was a clip before we were born and will be a clip after we have stopped trying to re-educate everyone and gone to our grave.
The term "magazine" is more of a generality - could be a tube or a box or even a larger storage place for arms or ammo or powder.
The term "clip" is more specific - for instance my rifle has a "tubular magazine" or a "clip magazine."
For examples of usage of these terms, read the little descriptions of each firearm in your SIR catalogue. The manufacturers ( who I hope have some knowledge of terms and have been talking guns for some time now) write the little descriptions for the catalogues.
SIR/ Cabela's 2008 Winter uses these terms :
10 round clip
10 shot clip
10 round detachable magazine
14 shot tubular magazine
10 shot clip magazine
10 shot flush mounting clip
tubular magazine
5 shot detachable clip
5 shot detachable clip
5 shot detachable magazine
4 shot flush fitting clip
4 shot and 7 shot clips
4 shot and 7 shot clips
two clips 4 shot and 7 shot included
hinged floor plate magazine
mag capacity 5
detachable magazine
magazine capacity 5
4 round drop out magazine
detachable clip
Internal box top feed magazine
internal magazine
detachable magazine
4-shot tubular magazine
Scanning down those, one thing that I notice is the lack of the word "box," except in the description of an " Internal box top feed magazine."
I also notice that the term "clip" is used much more on rimfires - though not exclusively.
When we pay a thousand bucks for something, maybe we want bigger words to use when we show it off?
I'll now proceed to my woodlot with my Husqvarna Model 272 XP to re-engineer some vegetation for the incendiary devise.
Naawww - I'm gonna go chop some wood. I might take a rifle with a clip of Noslers too.