WWI & WWII Machine Guns Question
- Thread starter Atkinham
- Start date
Say what? Do you mean all 12(2) and 12(3) owners must individually register with Controlled Goods Canada (whoever the hell that is) or is this something the CFC informs them of?
I've not heard of this before.
- Location
- Tucson, Arizona
Just curious, since the L1A1 was NEVER issued with a select fire capability, why is it prohibited?
Because it's an EVIL looking A-salt rifle??????
Oh by they way, I got my Australian L1A1 out of Canada.
Just curious, since the L1A1 was NEVER issued with a select fire capability, why is it prohibited?
Because it's an EVIL looking A-salt rifle??????
Oh by they way, I got my Australian L1A1 out of Canada.
Military type guns that were NOT FA are classed 12(5)
Military guns that were FA and converted to semi only for private ownership are classed as 12(3) converted autos
ergo...it is possible to be licensed to own a FN FAL converted auto but NOT be licensed to own a L1A1....make sense?
- Location
- Tucson, Arizona
Klunk, Like gun laws everywhere, it makes sense ONLY to a politician!
And you KNOW what I think about THOSE leftist jackasses.
And you KNOW what I think about THOSE leftist jackasses.
Last edited:
John, our Gummint basically took the California List and said, "Okay, let's ban everything on this list ........ and anything that even LOOKS LIKE one of them"..... and that's just what they did.
Of course, we destroyed the political party which did that, but nobody seems to care.
I always thought that "Responsible Government" meant that the Government was responsible to the People. Seems that they have reversed that a whole big bunch, and now us peasants are responsible to our Masters.
Talking with a lawyer a while back, he tells me that when he went to law school (about 15 years ago) they had ONE 40-minute lecture about the Constitution of this country. This may not seem odd, except that it is the Constitution of this country and the documents associated with and forming a part of it, which guarantee your right to own ANY private property, including firearms. But it is interesting that only 40 minutes out of a 3-year course, were devoted to any discussion about the Constitution at all. Small wonder the Government can pull off anything they want to: nobody knows the law.
See Magna Charta (1215, 1225), Bill of Rights (1688/89), British North America Act (1867 and updates), Canadian Bill of Rights (1960), Assize of Arms (1181) for more detail. For anti-taxers, there is also a discussion on rights in "Call It Extortion!", the book about anti-taxer Gerry Hart and his 46-year battle with Revenue Canada.
Of course, we destroyed the political party which did that, but nobody seems to care.
I always thought that "Responsible Government" meant that the Government was responsible to the People. Seems that they have reversed that a whole big bunch, and now us peasants are responsible to our Masters.
Talking with a lawyer a while back, he tells me that when he went to law school (about 15 years ago) they had ONE 40-minute lecture about the Constitution of this country. This may not seem odd, except that it is the Constitution of this country and the documents associated with and forming a part of it, which guarantee your right to own ANY private property, including firearms. But it is interesting that only 40 minutes out of a 3-year course, were devoted to any discussion about the Constitution at all. Small wonder the Government can pull off anything they want to: nobody knows the law.
See Magna Charta (1215, 1225), Bill of Rights (1688/89), British North America Act (1867 and updates), Canadian Bill of Rights (1960), Assize of Arms (1181) for more detail. For anti-taxers, there is also a discussion on rights in "Call It Extortion!", the book about anti-taxer Gerry Hart and his 46-year battle with Revenue Canada.
