I love the skeleton stock. How does it feel to shoot? I am thinking of replacing my fast stock with one.
Thanx for posting! I was wondering what that optic looked like on a xcr. How do you like it?
Wikid! Ive never seen one in person, is there a reticle etched into it incase of low/no light conditions? Its not dependant on the illuminated reticle?
I much prefer it over the FAST for weak hand-supported shooting. I also greatly prefer the aesthetics.I love the skeleton stock. How does it feel to shoot? I am thinking of replacing my fast stock with one.
I much prefer it over the FAST for weak hand-supported shooting. I also greatly prefer the aesthetics.
I like the folder over the fixed for the simple fact that it allows the rifle to fit into my 5.11 36" soft rifle cases (wish I'd measured more of my guns before making that decision...), otherwise the fixed stock is perfect. It's not hard to see why Robarm went away from the folder as it's not terribly well designed. Too loose when open and nothing to hold it closed aside from friction of the hinge mechanism. If they combined the tube folder with the hinge from the FAST it would be perfect.
I am fairly certain when they introduced the FAST they stopped production of the tube stocks entirely.They eliminated the folder?? That is news to me....
Thinking of putting on my vortex viper on there and test out the true accuracy of this rifle just to see if the haters are correct or not.
We are correct.
Show me five, 5 round groups on the same sheet of paper (at 100 yards), and I'll show you a disappointed xcr owner...
I am fairly certain when they introduced the FAST they stopped production of the tube stocks entirely.
Given that I was very specifically discussing tube style stocks in the post you quoted I would have thought it to be obvious what I was referring to. Or are you just trying to argue semantics?Yes, but the FAST stock is still a folder. Folding Adjustable STock
Given that I was very specifically discussing tube style stocks in the post you quoted I would have thought it to be obvious what I was referring to. Or are you just trying to argue semantics?