I'm also calling best joke of the year if these rifles ever have feeding issues with Norc .223 ammo.![]()
I hope they shoot better than they look cause damn, they are UGGGGLLLYYYY!![]()
I hope they shoot better than they look cause damn, they are UGGGGLLLYYYY!![]()

Absolutely 100% agree. I would pay the extra cash for a Tavor or XCR to avoid the funny looks showing up with something so ugly at the range.
It's like going to prom with the ugliest chick in school just cause she puts out.![]()
![]()
If she's good at putting out and you got a good supply of booze and paper bags, it's a non-issueI actually like the utilitarian look of it. The only beef I got with the rifle "on paper" is with the position of the safety selector.
One more major issue that I see is the fixed sight. Would be krappy trying to put any sort of optic on it.
One more major issue that I see is the fixed sight. Would be krappy trying to put any sort of optic on it.
One more major issue that I see is the fixed sight. Would be krappy trying to put any sort of optic on it.
You can see from this photo that a cheek weld would be non existent using a rail on the carrying handle.
![]()
I've said it before: someone should make a FAMAS conversion kit/chassis. That's be pretty slick.
Non-restricted, .223, uses AR mags, around $1000 with everything you need out of the box to shoot it.
Fugly bullpup rifle aside - can you name 1 rifle that has these characteristics that's not hot, hot, hot?
I can't seem to find any SU16's on the EE.
It looks as if it can be removed. I'd be interested in seeing a replacement rail for the top piece with the handle. It also lifts off according to other pics I've seen. The gun has lots of potention.
Too many people house shop and complain of paint and furniture, forgetting things can change as long as the foundation works.



























