This is getting tiresome. See post #80.
LOL you made me scroll back to post 80
But it was worth it
Shawn
This is getting tiresome. See post #80.
RCMP SFSS letters and emails to various retailers, potential manufacturers and importers of the various 50 beo magazines. I quoted a section from the one Armtac (was the importer for Alexander arms) posted on the forum earlier in this thread.Was that where?
LOL you made me scroll back to post 80
But it was worth it
News to me. Yesterday (by mistake) I loaded 10 rounds of 5.56 into an XCR 7.62x39 pistol mag. I noticed the printing on the mag before trying to shoot, but they sat int he mag just fine. Maybe tomorrow I'll see if they will feed. They look like they will.

genuinely surprised it worked even that much.Well, I tried this today. 10 rounds easily fit in the x39 magazines. Looking at it closely, it looked a little funny but they did fit. Did it work? Sorta. I only tried one magazine, in an AR15. It would feed 2 or 3 then jam. Tried it a few times and that was the result every time. BANGBANGBANG jam-clear jam-BANG BANG-jam-clear jam- BANG BANG BANG
Does this have any relevance to legality? I have no idea.![]()
Me too. Lol.![]()
So Brian are 7.62x39 mag prohib now too?
Shawn
So Brian are 7.62x39 mag prohib now too?
Shawn
If the RCMP have written letters and emails about them along with a FRT, they could possibly, but you would know better than I
If the RCMP have written letters and emails about them along with a FRT, they could possibly, but you would know better than I
You are the one claiming that feeding is now part of the law
Shawn
Shawn, not even you are dumb enough to suggest that the ability to fit in an action and feed bullets into the chamber isn't relevant to whether a mag is intended/designed/manufactured for a particular gun.
FF



























