You wouldn't carry two magazines on you belt for EDC. Way too heavy. Majority of the time I don't even carry a spare 10+1 is good enough for me. I do however keep a 17 round magazine in the car.
Virtually any centerfire long gun will work a lot better than a pistol.
Nobody carries them because a) it's hard to find a decent holster and b) this isn't mogadishu.
As far as situations go where Concealed Carry would have helped...any instance of someone being gravely wounded or killed by an assailant is an instance where it potentially could have helped.
Just to take a single example off the top of my head which was local to me personally: Jamie Kehoe was killed on a bus a matter of weeks ago when a fight broke out between two women. His throat was slashed by a third individual.
Had someone on the bus been legally carrying, it's possible that would never have happened. Had no-one on the bus been carrying, but Concealed Carry was legal and relatively common, it's also possible that the incident would never have happened, just because the risks of committing violent crime are greater when an unknown number of victims are secretly armed. Of course it's also possible that it would have happened exactly the same way; there is no way to know. But the fact is that in US states where concealed carry laws are enacted, violent crime diminishes.
A friend of mine down in the US is married to a woman who shot and killed an attacker with her legal carry weapon about 10 or 12 years ago. She carried in her purse. One day she had a knock at the door and, upon opening it, was attacked. She was fairly severely beaten by the time she got to her purse, but she did get there, and killed her attacker (a man totally unknown to her) before he finished beating her to death. Prior to that incident, I was not a supporter of concealed carry, as a matter of fact, because I thought that the odds of it ever actually helping were tiny, and I bought in to that "they'll probably use it against you" line (which now seems totally stupid to me).
Then it saved somebody I knew.
Incidents in which concealed carry would save you are rare. But as my father once said to me, "you will probably never need a gun in your entire life. But if what you need is a gun, nothing else will do."
I wouldn't carry! Here in Canada there really is no requirement. I understand that violent crime does and can happen, however, the odds are so low in Canada compared to the USA that there really is no need. Seeing that in my 52 years of life, I have not once had my life threatened, I feel pretty safe without a need to carry. With my two dobies, my house will never be broken into either.
On a flip side, from 1994-1999, I did have a CCW for New York State, as I belonged to a US shooting club and shot regularly in the US. One of the shooters at the club recommended I get a CCW as being a Canadian, knowing that our guns and ammo are in the trunk, we are easy targets with the amount of time we spent there. So I got one and used it in the US a couple of times, but even there, and the amount of times I travelled throughout New York State, I never encountered any life threatening moments or the need to actually have it. Lol, I still have my old CCW (now expired), just for memories sake.
Stay out of New York - Chicago - Detroit - LA you know the cities with the highest gun crime rates and the most restrictive gun laws in the States the rest of the country has a lower violent crime rate than Canada has but they still carry in these other areas.
I'd carry a handgun if it was legal here just like I carry a knife or put on my seat belt.
+1 not only that. In Canada, the self-defense laws would have to be changed for anyone to be able to actually use their carry gun in self-defense.
As it is now, Canadians have no right to use guns to protect their property or life.
All the PAL licenses we have are for "target shooting", "hunting" or "gun collecting". You have no right to use them for any other purposes.
Kinda retarded.
But what can you expect? We are the Queen's subjects.
af_newbie2;13654744 But what can you expect? We are the Queen's subjects.[/QUOTE said:And herein lays the problem. If we had the backbone to oust the scoundrels back in 1776, like our southern neighbours did, we'd be totin' as we speak.![]()
You really should frequent the legal forums. You have it totally backwards. Canadian law allows the use of force, up to and including lethal, to MATCH the threat. The carry and storage laws are what make this impractical. And you can use them for that purpose, but you can't aquire them for that purpose. If you use them to save your life you will most likely be charged with careless storage, not murder. I'm simplifying a bit and it makes no sense, but this is the way it is apparently.
He turned out alright in the end, no?![]()
You really should frequent the legal forums. You have it totally backwards. Canadian law allows the use of force, up to and including lethal, to MATCH the threat. The carry and storage laws are what make this impractical. And you can use them for that purpose, but you can't aquire them for that purpose. If you use them to save your life you will most likely be charged with careless storage, not murder. I'm simplifying a bit and it makes no sense, but this is the way it is apparently.
I think people here are conflating the words charged and convicted. You will be charged with a slew of offences should you use anything in any manner of self defence. You aren’t allowed to defend yourself in Canada under almost any circumstance. Your job as a citizen is to run away from a threat. You cannot exceed the force you’ve been met with, and you can’t arm yourself with anything for self defence. Hence things like concealed carry, tasers, mace, or even carrying a pocket knife without a reasonable explanation could have you facing charges. Charges you will not win. The RCMPs job is to arrest and file a report after a crime has been committed. That’s it. No serving. No protecting. Personally I recommend a recurve with field tips. Nice and quiet and I can argue if I was trying to murder a would be intruder I’d have used a broad head.



























