CZ 600 Trail - Interesting Details!

Bartok5

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Super GunNutz
Rating - 100%
308   0   0
Hey Felllas,

I just ppicked up my new CZ 600 Trail from a non-site sponsor in Red Deer, AB. This particular dealer got in a shipment of 10x 5.56mm Trail rifles and all were sold within an hour of an e-mailed announcement. I was fortunate enough to be on my computer when that e-mail came in, and was able to act upon it immediately. Good thing that I did, because by the time I pulled the pin there were only 5 left in stock. To say that the CZ 600 Trail is a hot commodity right now is perhaps a gross understatement! Interesting, considering the CZ Trail really doesn't seem to have much of a purpose beyond casual backpacking/plinking afield and perhaps (local regulations permitting), some light hunting. Still, they are selling like hotcakes whenever they appear in still limited numbers.

The rifle appears and feels to be well-built with a fairly smooth bolt-throw. Nothing like Tikka smooth, but reasonable and with zero binding, whhich is key for my personal tastes. Subject to confirmation in the field, I think that the Eotech Vudu 1-10x LPVO is going to be a good fit on the CZ Trail. Lightweight and compact, it offers both quick, short-range targetting akin to a Red Dot, as well as reasonably long-range precision sighting based on a "Christmas Tree" reticle. The Trail happily accepts both metal and synthetic STANAG AR15 magazines, both of which readily drop free. I am going with the Mission First Tactcial (MFT) 10-round "Pistol" magazine to feed my 5.56mm Trail.

Zeroing and first groupings will occur tomorrow if all goes according to plan. I have read that the Trail is a bit of a slow beginner with initial group sizes in excess of MOA. Once it settles down however, sub-MOA is the norm with quality match ammo.

My longer term plan is to have this rifle rebarrelled in .300 Blk, whidh I think would be the perfect calibre for such a handy little bolt-gun, giving it some greater hunting punch out to 300m or so. I spoke with the head Armourer at the Red Deer store I was attending, and he seemed to think that it was readily do-able despite the locking lugs being located in the Barrel itself....

Public Service Announcement - Canadian CZ 600 Trails are shipping from the Czech Republic with M15 x 1 Metric Muzzle Threads, NOT 1/2 x 28. Muzzle devices such as the B+T APC 223 2-Port Brake (which I happened to have on-hand) fit and function perfrectly on the CZ 600 Trail riflesl


20230212-151810.jpg



20230212-151920.jpg
 
Last edited:
Very nice looking package. Cheek rest is very questionable though.

It also appears that bipod + optics + muzzle break would double the total weight )
 
Very nice looking package. Cheek rest is very questionable though.

It also appears that bipod + optics + muzzle break would double the total weight )

The Cheek Rest/Riser only works if I have the stock at 3/4 length on the 2nd to last detent. At full extension the Stock is too long for me, forcing me into a bladed stance. That in turn, puts the Cheek Rest/Riser too far to the rear to be of much use. The more perpendicular to the shoulder I position the rifle, the more useful the Cheek Rest becomes. 3/4 Stock length is perfect for me to make maximum use of that Cheek Rest.
 
Last edited:
Very nice looking package. Cheek rest is very questionable though.

It also appears that bipod + optics + muzzle break would double the total weight )


The stripped weight is 2.7 Kg or 6 lbs with the plastic BUIS (that I added). Mount the optic, Muzzle Brake and Bipod and the weight climbs to 4 Kg or 9.1 lbs total. Still very light and handy feeling, even fully accessorized with 10x optical capability. The Bipod is QD Picatinny, so easily removed if not wanted for a particular hike.
 
Mark double check the bolts for any MLOK stuff you put on the rifle aren't touching the barrel. I had to grind several down to fit the tight clearance. Surprised you got metal magazines to lock. Any of the ones I or friends tried wouldn't lock without removing .030" on the backside of the mag catch slot on the magazine. You could do a weird manipulation of both magazine catches to get one to lock in though. Poly mags all worked great.
 
Mark double check the bolts for any MLOK stuff you put on the rifle aren't touching the barrel. I had to grind several down to fit the tight clearance. Surprised you got metal magazines to lock. Any of the ones I or friends tried wouldn't lock without removing .030" on the backside of the mag catch slot on the magazine. You could do a weird manipulation of both magazine catches to get one to lock in though. Poly mags all worked great.

I checked the bolt/Barrel clearance when I mounted the MLOK rail sections. I had a heads-up from one of the Youtube videos I watched while awaiting the arrival of a rifle.

It would seem that I spoke too soon regarding metal magazines. The only one that I grabbed (E-lander) just happened to fit and lock. Based on your comment I just tried some ASC and C Products magazines without success. They do NOT lock in, as you noted. I have plenty of synthetic magazines, so no need for metal anyways, but good to know in order to avoid potential disappointment.
 
Do you think a prism scope with a short eye relief(like the 3x primary arms kind) would work on the rifle? Worried about one not being able to be mounted back far enough to be comfortable with the cheek rest

Good to see the grip mounted without interference with the barrel
 
Do you think a prism scope with a short eye relief(like the 3x primary arms kind) would work on the rifle? Worried about one not being able to be mounted back far enough to be comfortable with the cheek rest

Good to see the grip mounted without interference with the barrel

I wondered the same thing, and opted for the Low Power Variable Optic with more forgiving eye-relief for that exact same reason. You could flip a cantilever mount around backwards to extend a tube-optic rearwards, but that doesn't apply to a Prism Optic which usually comes with its own integral mount. What you need is some way to extend the Top Rail backwards, perhaps by using a Low Picatinny Rail Riseras a rearwards Rail extension of sorts.
 
So sad I missed out on these, and very happy for you! I have in stock notifications with everyone but a very strong feeling I should just place a backorder with your mentioned non-site sponsor. They were the only ones that had GHM9s in stock when I wanted mine, maybe they will get this back in stock quicker too.
 
So sad I missed out on these, and very happy for you! I have in stock notifications with everyone but a very strong feeling I should just place a backorder with your mentioned non-site sponsor. They were the only ones that had GHM9s in stock when I wanted mine, maybe they will get this back in stock quicker too.

Although CGN somewhat understandably does not like us publicly endorsing non-site sponsors, I must acknowledge that RDSC appears to have strong distributor support and excellent industry conections, frequently allowing them to stock high-demand firearms. I spend a LOT of money there.
 
1200US, Currently in stock at IRG, in Canada and possibly with 1/2X28 threads.

It's a bit too pricy for me right now at around 1600Cdn.... Looking forward to some range reviews on this and the new Siberian soon.
 
Yeah I was a little disappointed to see the IRG price personally, depending on how I feel over the next few days and the responses I get to a bunch of emails I sent out tonight, I may or may not just backorder one with RDSC, I am sure lots have already and I don't want to be too far back in the line. I agree with you that they clearly have the inventory movement to get their hands on stuff others can't, I've been buying from them over 10 years now.
 
1200US, Currently in stock at IRG, in Canada and possibly with 1/2X28 threads.

It's a bit too pricy for me right now at around 1600Cdn.... Looking forward to some range reviews on this and the new Siberian soon.

I had my CZ 600 Trail out on the 100m range the other day. It was a VERY breezy +4C that felt like -10! Winds were 30 gusting to 60 kph easily. Anyhow, excuses aside, I was getting 2 MOA 5-shot groups with PMC XTAC 62 gr bulk ammo. The one factory "premium" cartridge that I tried turned in a respectable (and repeatable) .75" 5-shot group of Hornady 53 gr VMAX. I was pretty pleased with that, given the lousy conditions. Suffice it to say that with the right ammo, these little rifles can shoot! I can't wait for a warm and sunny spring day to realy wring out the accuracy potential of the CZ Barrel.
 
Last edited:
Not surprised by this, I would imagine CZ to be a higher degree of quality and expect such (though, it is my first rifle of the brand) and sold my BCL Bison 12.5" to fund this eventuality, just didnt have it gone in time while RDSC had them in stock.

Anyway, if I could get ~1-1.5 MOA out of the BCL when I did my part with Hornady ammo, I would hope the CZ can do better with nearly 4" more.

Very excited for this! Thank you for your post, hard to find much first hand experience on this rifle.
 
I had my CZ 600 Trail out on the 100m range the other day. It was a VERY breezy +4C that felt like -10! Winds were 30 gusting to 60 kph easily. Anyhow, excuses aside, I was getting 2 MOA 5-shot groups with PMC XTAC 62 gr bulk ammo. The one factory "premium" cartridge that I tried turned in a respectable (and repeatable) .75" 5-shot group of Hornady 53 gr VMAX. I was pretty pleased with that, given the lousy conditions. Suffice it to say that with the right ammo, these little rifles can shoot! I can't wait for a warm and sunny spring day to realy wring out the accuracy potential of the CZ Barrel.

That sounds like a great first range trip considering it's advertised as a less then moa shooter. From what I've seen online the CZ reps say the barrel is good enough but something about the way they connected the receiver to the plastic stock is not as solidly bedded as the other 600 models.
 
That sounds like a great first range trip considering it's advertised as a less then moa shooter. From what I've seen online the CZ reps say the barrel is good enough but something about the way they connected the receiver to the plastic stock is not as solidly bedded as the other 600 models.

That is news to me regarding the reasons for low expectations with the Trail's inherent accuracy. That said, I am well aware of the factory literature that guarantees only 2 MOA for the Trail and 1 MOA for all of the other models in the 600 Model range. The bottom line is that there has to be a reason behind the Trail's less than stellar accuracy expectaitions and I suspect that as you reported, the bedding (or a lack thereof), has something to do with it. At the end of the day however, my particular Trail delivers sub-MOA 5-round groups with 53 gr Hornady VMAX, which exceeds my expectations. With 5 more brands/loads of ammo still to test in my initial experimentation, I am hopeful of even better results to come with nicer testing conditions and some Rifle/Barrel break-in.
 
That is news to me regarding the reasons for low expectations with the Trail's inherent accuracy. That said, I am well aware of the factory literature that guarantees only 2 MOA for the Trail and 1 MOA for all of the other models in the 600 Model range. The bottom line is that there has to be a reason behind the Trail's less than stellar accuracy expectaitions and I suspect that as you reported, the bedding (or a lack thereof), has something to do with it. At the end of the day however, my particular Trail delivers sub-MOA 5-round groups with 53 gr Hornady VMAX, which exceeds my expectations. With 5 more brands/loads of ammo still to test in my initial experimentation, I am hopeful of even better results to come with nicer testing conditions and some Rifle/Barrel break-in.

The one Rep said the barrels were more then up to good accuracy and they fully expected them to do better then 2moa but were covering their butts.... :)
I like the idea of a non metallic lower for cold weather handling.
 
Might have more to do with bulk 556 and milsurp 7.62x39

It's the stock, they offer both of those calibres in the other models without a reduced guarantee on accuracy.

The Alpha 7.62X39 looks pretty nice and should be a fair bit less expensive.
 
Back
Top Bottom