Remington 700 Mountain Rifle scope choices

I use an S&B fixed 6x42 on my “mountain rifle” but it’s a heavier model I wouldn’t really suggest for this gun. Great scope and fits the “theme” though. In time I may replace it with something lighter. Also carried it around this and last year but never connected with anything. DGY you might like it; the 1 inch models are lighter

;)[/QUOTE]

Tell me more….[/QUOTE]

https://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php/2365850-Schmidt-and-Bender-Klassic-6X42
 
How much scope you put on your mountain rifle should depend on what your final weight goal is, this is a personal decision which will vary with each individual.

How much scope is needed to make a 600 yd shot is subjective and bias to your marksmanship ability.

I have a tendency to go for higher magnification, but the reality is at 600 yards I can pretty much make the same number of hits on a 6 inch target at 6x as I will at 15x.

My mountain rifle scopes currently are a Leupold VX3 4.5-14x40 B&C (308), VX5HD 3-15x44 ZL2 (6.5 Creedmoor), VX3HD 4.5-14x40 ZL (300WM), Vortex Razor LHT 3-15x44 (280AI),and a Swarovski 3.5-18x44 BT (7-08).

I had a VX3i 3.5-10x40 CDS on the 7-08 but swapped it out for the Swaro Z5 3.5-18, it is all personal preference. :)
 
It sure wouldn't be my choice for bush hunting or for closer encounters.

I’ve shot game at under 10 yards with fixed 6x Leupolds. I also regularly shoot to 600 yards with them. No problems. The 6x36 (discontinued) gets a bad rap compared to the 6x42 but it is also extremely user friendly. Many are thinking of the M8 6x36’s but they are not the same same scope as the FX II.

R36AAee.jpg
 
Long story short, one of these had a lot more appeal than a current production 700 does, and yknow...we're kinda gun nutz.

If you had to pick a scope out for a Remington 700 Mountain Rifle in 280 Rem, what would you go with?

I'm tempted to say Leupold FX-III, 6x36 or 6x42 but more opinions are always informative.

I just took an ultralight build I put my fx2 6x36 on (korth installed cds-zl) and shot it against my daily with the Trijicon accupoint 3-9x40 side by side, at a buddies home range, and we both were shocked at the difference. My buddy hadn't seen one of these Trijicons yet and I had already migrated to them from the lightweight leupolds a few years back but having them side by side and shoot out to 400 it was pretty easy choice. Trijicon for 13.4 oz is worth it hands down and just verified what I learned when I tried the first one out for a bit before committing the full move to them. The extra 3.5-4 oz of the trijicon is worth it on glass alone, then add in the no batteries required illuminated dot that makes hunting shots on game super fast and intuitive, then take the fact you have 3-9x range of magnification versatility, it's all win win and worth 3.5-4 oz and worth the extra 400 bucks. If you check these Trijicons out it will cost you about 1100 bucks lol, but you'll be able to offset with whatever you can sell the 6x36 for. Turned that ultralight project into a red dot short range fun gun the next day as the other thing you learn shooting an ultralight beside a regular rifle is just how much better you shoot the regular rifle and how much quicker it is to settle in and get an accurate shot off. So definitely don't be afraid to add a bit of weight to that thing. ;) Still debating if I'll sell that 6x36, may end up on a rimfire or something, shoot me pms guys, make some offers. ;)

pathfinder, nice build
 
Long story short, one of these had a lot more appeal than a current production 700 does, and yknow...we're kinda gun nutz.

If you had to pick a scope out for a Remington 700 Mountain Rifle in 280 Rem, what would you go with?

I'm tempted to say Leupold FX-III, 6x36 or 6x42 but more opinions are always informative.

My money would be on the 2.5-8x Leupold, but Rob isn't wrong in suggesting the 3.5-10x Leupold. Just don't drink the KoolAid and put on a scope that is overly large or heavy. Otherwise you waste any benefits of the Ti.
 
I just took an ultralight build I put my fx2 6x36 on (korth installed cds-zl) and shot it against my daily with the Trijicon accupoint 3-9x40 side by side, at a buddies home range, and we both were shocked at the difference. My buddy hadn't seen one of these Trijicons yet and I had already migrated to them from the lightweight leupolds a few years back but having them side by side and shoot out to 400 it was pretty easy choice. Trijicon for 13.4 oz is worth it hands down and just verified what I learned when I tried the first one out for a bit before committing the full move to them. The extra 3.5-4 oz of the trijicon is worth it on glass alone, then add in the no batteries required illuminated dot that makes hunting shots on game super fast and intuitive, then take the fact you have 3-9x range of magnification versatility, it's all win win and worth 3.5-4 oz and worth the extra 400 bucks. If you check these Trijicons out it will cost you about 1100 bucks lol, but you'll be able to offset with whatever you can sell the 6x36 for. Turned that ultralight project into a red dot short range fun gun the next day as the other thing you learn shooting an ultralight beside a regular rifle is just how much better you shoot the regular rifle and how much quicker it is to settle in and get an accurate shot off. So definitely don't be afraid to add a bit of weight to that thing. ;) Still debating if I'll sell that 6x36, may end up on a rimfire or something, shoot me pms guys, make some offers. ;)

pathfinder, nice build

They pop up on the EE every now and then for about $700 too, if a person wants to go that route.
 
I just took an ultralight build I put my fx2 6x36 on (korth installed cds-zl) and shot it against my daily with the Trijicon accupoint 3-9x40 side by side, at a buddies home range, and we both were shocked at the difference. My buddy hadn't seen one of these Trijicons yet and I had already migrated to them from the lightweight leupolds a few years back but having them side by side and shoot out to 400 it was pretty easy choice. Trijicon for 13.4 oz is worth it hands down and just verified what I learned when I tried the first one out for a bit before committing the full move to them. The extra 3.5-4 oz of the trijicon is worth it on glass alone, then add in the no batteries required illuminated dot that makes hunting shots on game super fast and intuitive, then take the fact you have 3-9x range of magnification versatility, it's all win win and worth 3.5-4 oz and worth the extra 400 bucks. If you check these Trijicons out it will cost you about 1100 bucks lol, but you'll be able to offset with whatever you can sell the 6x36 for. Turned that ultralight project into a red dot short range fun gun the next day as the other thing you learn shooting an ultralight beside a regular rifle is just how much better you shoot the regular rifle and how much quicker it is to settle in and get an accurate shot off. So definitely don't be afraid to add a bit of weight to that thing. ;) Still debating if I'll sell that 6x36, may end up on a rimfire or something, shoot me pms guys, make some offers. ;)

pathfinder, nice build

The OP has an Accupoint 3-9 listed on the EE.
 
I have a couple of 2.5 -8 Leupolds ( used to be my fav) also but my older eyes like more power now so the. 3.5 -10 or 4.5-14 are my go toos now JMO RJ

I got one of these too, also with a korth installed cds (pre-vx3hd...copycats ;) ), it just got re-parallaxed and now rides on a .17 hmr lol...I have a 6x36 and 4x33 set up same cds-zl etc. still kicking around that may follow suit on the rimfires lol.

Something else about leupold variables, they seem to exaggerate actual magnification, the 3-9x40 trijicon feels every bit a 2.5-3-10x to me, appears more optimistic in mag range or at least accurate than leupolds, maybe it just appears that way due to such nicer glass, it's like someone turned on the light and so crystal clear compared to the leupolds. Take that for what it's worth. Be prepared to open your wallet if you get a chance to see them side x side and yes i'm almost 50 and eyes slipping, and same with buddy who just saw the light as well who's a couple years older than me. So don't go looking at these Accuppoints Jim...it might cost ya. ;)
 
shoot, I'll send him my 6x36 for it in trade if it's green dot

oh cripes its Joel, we go way back lol, PM me Joel if you wanna talk trades :)

Hahahaha man, I love the glass! Its crystal clear...and yeah the scope ain't heavy. But I'm having trouble adjusting to the triangle.

You know if I could do it again I'd actually do a crosshair or mil dot with illum. center dot.

That and, well, its a lot of cash on a scope and I'm a cheap bastid...but its a DANG nice scope. I'd been thinkin "Wow that looks like about the most bestest big game scope for a guy who wants to put bullets into vitals and often from inside 100 yards out to 300". And it may well be.

If you love clarity and you love that triangle! I think I can get by with a cheaper scope just fine TBH. And I prefer a crosshair. But wow. Was pretty cool watching 7.62x39 impact targets through it.
 
Hmmm the price seems reasonable….. maybe it would fit well with my new single shot i’m getting… hmmmmm
 
If it’s going to the mountains 6x32 to keep it sleek and the lightest. If not 6x42 I’ve got a copy cat (a Pentax) would love to upgrade it to a Leupold. But never go anywhere without your binoculars. But another vote for a 3.5x10x40
 
Hahahaha man, I love the glass! Its crystal clear...and yeah the scope ain't heavy. But I'm having trouble adjusting to the triangle.

You know if I could do it again I'd actually do a crosshair or mil dot with illum. center dot.

That and, well, its a lot of cash on a scope and I'm a cheap bastid...but its a DANG nice scope. I'd been thinkin "Wow that looks like about the most bestest big game scope for a guy who wants to put bullets into vitals and often from inside 100 yards out to 300". And it may well be.

If you love clarity and you love that triangle! I think I can get by with a cheaper scope just fine TBH. And I prefer a crosshair. But wow. Was pretty cool watching 7.62x39 impact targets through it.

Ya I’m out, I had the triangle on a custom ranch 14 6.8 and it was a decent match for a speedy close range rig was good on calling coyotes but ya for the general hunting the dot duplex or mil-dot are the way to fly. For guys looking for the fast action 1-4 or 1-6 or 1-8 types I would take your scope over those heavy pigs in a blink. I’ve killed coyote double at 30 yards with 4x bolt action so 3x with that triangle would be a defensive champ. So when you get it sold you know where a 6x36 is lol...we can chat then.
 
R700 .280 Rem MTN LSS
Bought into the Vortex hype a couple years ago and mounted a 3-15x42 LHT, could not get used to side focus on a point and shoot hunting rifle, plus the fact the rifle felt top heavy and the illumination of the busy reticle made low light hunting impossible.
Switched back my go to VX-R 3-9x40 in low Talleys, perfect combination.
 
I have owned the Remington 700 Mountains rifle a couple of times, both in 280 Rem.
Finally got a 280 Rem in a LH Rem 700 (XCR action).

On all 3 rifles, over the years, I have gone with the Leupold Vari X III, VX-III and now VX-3, all in the 3-10x40. The current 3-10x40 has the B&C reticle.
Light, bright, robust, and w/ the B&C reticle I can adjust point of aim quickly should the animal move or be found at a different distance than anticipated.
I also own a few of the 2.5-8x36 scopes w/ B&C reticles. Great scopes and just a little shorter and lighter. Use them on SA rifles, whereas I am using the 3-10's on LA rifles. As these rifles are in less powerful cartridges, the maximum of 8 power is not a handicap for hunting.

I have owned the 6x42 in the past, and while a great scope for more open country, I switched back to the variable, as I hunt varied terrain and the variable provides better service by being able to adjust the power range down for short distances, and dialling up for longer distances, and range work where I appreciate the 10 power to see my target better when practicing, or doing load development.
The main advantage of the 6x42 over the 6x36 is the extra amount of light that gets to your eye under low light conditions; secondary becomes field of view. But this is only if you are younger and your pupil will still expand to 7mm. As we age, our pupil can no longer open to 7mm, and 6mm may be fine. At about 50 years old, it will only open to about 5mm, so the larger scope will longer make a difference, other than field of view.

The main reason I prefer the 3-10x40 is that I have that extra edge in magnification as stated above, and a little better field of view, and fits LA rifles such as the 280 Mtn rifle just a little better. Being in my 50's now, my pupils will not open as wide as they once did, so when hunting in low light conditions, I do not crank it up to 10 power anymore for longer shots, as 8 power will transmit all the light my eye will accept. And at 3 power, I can still find an animal in the thick brush at close range, where a fixed 6 doesn't provide the same versatility. (And yes, I have shot mountain goats at 15 and 30 yards in the timber and stunted evergreens on mountain tops, so being able to dial down is an advantage that may be required!)

I have purchased a Ruger No.1 in 257 Roberts and have been thinking that a fixed 6 (that aforementioned S&B Klassik has my attention) mentioned would be nice on it, as it would mainly be used for open terrain hunting for deer or antelope.
As most of the large open fields that I have permission to hunt locally have access through the timber, a variable makes sense where I sometimes catch the deer in timber as I make my way in and out of the fields, as this is the majority of the hunting I would have for this rifle, whereas the antelope hunting occurs less frequently. I am also planning an axis deer and blackbuck hunt for this rifle.
Decisions, decisions! (If I could locate a VX-III or 3, 3-10x40 B&C in gloss for this beautiful No.1...)
 
Back
Top Bottom