... So if the dealership tells you there was a QC issue with your car (engine, transmission, whatever that's major part of), you would sign and accept the car to drive it, and conclude it's a ####ty car when you were very well notified of the issue and it's not the intended spec/quality of it?
Negative attention or criticism is still a good thing but damn, isn't it getting a little petty? It's not even released or shot any rounds yet and it looks like people just WANT IT to be a piece of junk. Have some faith or patience you miserable people.
Screw this. I'm going hunting lol.
Lol Dude calling me petty when he can't even get his point across without cussing (and don't you dare tuck tail and edit your posts again - stand by your words or go back to the McDonald's ball pit). Cute.
EXACTLY! Your words!! It hasn't shot rounds yet, it is unproven. BCL, Kodiak, all those makers said they were going to be game changers for the Canadian market and were an absolute letdown once people got them. Granted, I kind of like cheap guns that don't shoot, because it means I can tinker and turn them into reliable guns, my way. I have even said on here that I want it to work., but I am some sort of monster for not kissing Bartok's ass or assuming it will be the most incredible shooty shoot since John Moses himself.
QC caught a problem, fine. Doing one thing right doesn't give them a pass for other things. And it certainly doesn't mean we need to "volunteer" rounds for them to test a product they want to sell us... unless that's seriously how you think the world works.
More proof, less lazy marketing please.