Target practice, and probably competition down the road. Oh and of course to have a reliable self defense tool for the end of the world of course![]()
RFB.
It's funny how all the negative views are always prefaced with "I don't own one, but....."
Mine will shoot 1.5 MOA, is shorter and lighter than any other 308 semi on the market, and works perfectly as long as you avoid steel cased ammo.
Ask anyone that actually *owns* one if they like it. The answer will be "f**k yeah!"
Ya I once considered that, but I dont want to be confined to a range. And besides, how accurate are they? I have to say thats probably the one downside to assault rifles is that accuracy isn't great on most of them, but like an earlier poster said, you trade that off for reliability in harsh conditions. but honestly if a swiss can get 1.5 moa a@ 100 yards thats the kind of gun I want. And all I would be putting on it would be some really nice optic of some kind. I've seen dudes put 4k into an ar with all the lights and lasers and what not on it, and too me that would be a waste of money if its only getting 3-4 moa. But as the saying goes... to each their own
Precision wise, a rack grade AR15 should get you 2-3 MOA with your average random factory ammo, fine tune your ammo and you'll more than likely see no difference between it and a PE90. 
Would someone with a FN fs2000 pipe up with some detailed descriptions?
I have to say thats probably the one downside to assault rifles...
The XCR-L can run 6.8SPC and 7.62x39 in addition to the .223 kit. The two former kits can be used for dear hunting.
I love my AR 15's and just got a AR 10, owned a Swiss arms for a month or 2 and couldn't justify the price tag of one. It seems to me like the Swiss arms is more of a perceived value that actual value, people will tell you it's the greatest gun ever made and worth every penny. I just can't figure why? probably to justify the price to themselves.
If it wasn't for the AR platform being restricted the Swiss would be nothing more than an oddity in Canada. As for the other options I have no real opinion as I've never even handled them.
Despite outwards appearances the ergonomics are actually better than the Tavor. Weight is approximately the same. Ambidextrous, although the charging handle is fixed on the left (it ejects forward to the right). Full-length top rail; factory BUIS are crap (front is removable). Trigger is really good and the thing is a tack driver (mine, anyway). The only real downsides are the cost (on par with a Swiss Arms) and that it won't take polymer magazines like PMAGs (aluminum or steel ones only) - and you need to either couple LAR-15's or run them with a C-Products base plate to be able to yank them out. And the non-restricted ones are next-to-unobtanium.
Despite outwards appearances the ergonomics are actually better than the Tavor. Weight is approximately the same. Ambidextrous, although the charging handle is fixed on the left (it ejects forward to the right). Full-length top rail; factory BUIS are crap (front is removable). Trigger is really good and the thing is a tack driver (mine, anyway). The only real downsides are the cost (on par with a Swiss Arms) and that it won't take polymer magazines like PMAGs (aluminum or steel ones only) - and you need to either couple LAR-15's or run them with a C-Products base plate to be able to yank them out. And the non-restricted ones are next-to-unobtanium.
I don't think she'd approve..
My vote goes Swiss.
Thanks for the input! The polymer mags are too wide? The fs2000 is next on the list, can't wait! I only hope we can find a non-restricted one...
The FS2000 was on my list of rifles to eventually get. Unfortunately they stopped being exported and Kodiak who was bringing them in at a decent price stopped selling firearms. I like my Tavor, but would also wanted the FS2000. Hopefully we can get them again. With the bottom rail I think they look pretty cool. The ergonomics look to be excellent. Also I have a PS90 so you need the whole set.![]()



























