Nobody has mentioned what you are shooting at. For deer, absolutely. Moose, elk etc is pushing it imo. A 30/30 will kill just about anything in North America at close range. Stretching things out on heavy game makes it an iffy proposition to me.
Nobody has mentioned what you are shooting at. For deer, absolutely. Moose, elk etc is pushing it imo. A 30/30 will kill just about anything in North America at close range. Stretching things out on heavy game makes it an iffy proposition to me.
this should be an easy kill on a deer at 200 yds? Your thoughts please
My father killed 15 or 20 moose with a Win 94 in .32 Special with 170 grain Silver Tip factory ammo, from 20 - 200 yards. Essentially the same as a .30-30... I think it can be done safely and ethically with the better ammunition available to reloaders. Personally, I never felt the need to use a 94 on moose as I bought an old 77 tanger in 7x57 with my yard work money as a young teen... but my first dozen deer were taken with a 94.Nobody has mentioned what you are shooting at. For deer, absolutely. Moose, elk etc is pushing it imo. A 30/30 will kill just about anything in North America at close range. Stretching things out on heavy game makes it an iffy proposition to me.
Yup, I'm actually reading his book right now. I think his 300 yard load was for a rifle with an "improved" chamber and a 24 inch barrel Winchester. I will look back next time I pick it up for another chapter.San Fadala wrote a book on the 30-30 years ago. IIRC he had a 300 yard load for it using 165 grain boat tails.
You can kill moose with just about anything. They are not particularly hard to kill if you can shoot. Just saying there are better choices for longer ranges.The OP inquired about deer shooting.My father killed 15 or 20 moose with a Win 94 in .32 Special with 170 grain Silver Tip factory ammo, from 20 - 200 yards. Essentially the same as a .30-30... I think it can be done safely and ethically with the better ammunition available to reloaders. Personally, I never felt the need to use a 94 on moose as I bought an old 77 tanger in 7x57 with my yard work money as a young teen... but my first dozen deer were taken with a 94.
No, the OP asked about using a .30-30 out to 200 yards.You can kill moose with just about anything. They are not particularly hard to kill if you can shoot. Just saying there are better choices for longer ranges.The OP inquired about deer shooting.
Comparing factory ammo, 150gr fusion in the 30-30 with 180gr fusion in the 308win, the 308win has the same velocity at 500yds as the 30-30 does at 200...Would everyone feel the same about a 308 stuffed with 180's at the same distance?
R.
One could easily make them very very close, performance wise, given the same pressures and pointy bullets.Comparing factory ammo, 150gr fusion in the 30-30 with 180gr fusion in the 308win, the 308win has the same velocity at 500yds as the 30-30 does at 200...
So no, most people probably wouldn't feel the same.
Punching a small hole a critter at long range out past where the bullet expands will still likely kill it, most don’t feel comfortable with that.One could easily make them very very close, performance wise, given the same pressures and pointy bullets.
Would they feel the same then?
Seems very silly that folks can't comprehend a 30-30 will drop damn near anything its pointed at, at 200 plus yards, in this country.
R.
200 yards is "long range" now? When did that happen?Punching a small hole a critter at long range out past where the bullet expands will still likely kill it, most don’t feel comfortable with that.
I just picked up cil 830 in 30-30, same as Savage 340, I put an older Bushnell scopechief 2.5-8 scope on it and with 150 gr fusion can put 3 rounds in a Tim Hortons coffee lid at 200 yds, this should be an easy kill on a deer at 200 yds? Your thoughts please
No, the OP specifically asked about deer at 200 yards. This thread has widened out from the original question.No, the OP asked about using a .30-30 out to 200 yards.
Of course there are better options, no sh*t... this is a gun forum, do expect a single poster not to know that?
No, the OP specifically asked about deer at 200 yards. This thread has widened out from the original question.
For deer, absolutely.Your statement was "there are better choices for longer ranges." I was pointing out that he didn't ask about anything other than a .30-30 @ 200 yards. Everyone here knows there are better choices, there are always better choices, it is a question of "what is enough... is a .30-30 enough at 200 yards?"
My answer, yes it is.